Looking Back At Star Wars Episode One: The Phantom Menace 25 Years Later

This year is the 25th anniversary of Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, which is one of the most divisive films ever made. It was the first Star Wars film since Return of the Jedi in 1983, and saw George Lucas return to his epic universe and present the backstory to his original trilogy. Iconic villain Darth Vader is shown as 9-year-old Anakin Skywalker, a slave living with his mother in the backwater world of Tatooine. His encounter with Jedi Knights Qui-Gon Jin and Obi-Wan Kenobi (his future mentor), as well as his future wife, Padme Amidala, put him on the path to his later role as a powerful Jedi Knight and eventually, his turn to the dark side as the evil Sith lord Darth Vader. 

Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace was eagerly anticipated from its announcement and was greeted with very diverse reactions when released. Many fans were just ecstatic to have another Star Wars film in theaters after more than a decade of nothing being released. It was a very different time than now with many TV shows on Disney +and several films being planned. The only Star Wars materials since Jedi was released were the well-received series of books by Timothy Zahn and other novels and comics such as Star Wars: Dark Empire. A new film, especially one that would be the missing first three episodes, (the original trilogy was marketed as Episodes IV to VI), was a thrilling prospect.

However, there were many fans who were disappointed with what they saw as a film with a more childish tone due to the introduction of Jar Jar Binks, an alien Gungan that helps the Jedi and Anakin to battle the forces of the Trade Federation, the villains in the film who were controlled by Darth Sidious, who is really Senator Palpatine, the future Emperor seen in Return of the Jedi. Jar Jar’s antics, weird mannerisms and manner of speaking was a turn off for many. Critics of the film were also unhappy with the more complicated plot of the movie, which focused on political intrigue in the Galactic Senate, as Palpatine maneuvered his way to the office of Chancellor of the Republic. This was unlike the simpler plots of the first films, which were a more basic story of good vs evil. The introduction of a more scientific explanation of the Force was also criticized, with the idea of midichlorians as being the reason for people having Force powers was seen as less interesting, as opposed to the more mystical view of the Force from the original movies.

Having said this, I liked Lucas’ idea of expanding the mythology of the Star Wars universe and showing how a democracy like the Republic would descend into a tyranny in the form of the Galactic Empire. it was also interesting to see a different era in Star Wars. Instead of the battle-scarred ships and planets seen in the original trilogy, we are shown more peaceful and polished areas in the galaxy. It makes sense since the film takes place over 30 years before A New Hope. Seeing the Jedi Order in its prime is great to see, with Qui-Gon and Obi-Wan battling Palpatine’s protege, Darth Maul in spectacular light saber battles, which were incredibly choreographed.

The reputation of the film has been somewhat improved in the subsequent years as many have come to appreciate the film for its positive attributes. The special effects were groundbreaking with the CGI used to created Jar Jar being a precursor to later films and characters that were brought to life via this technique. Gollum from The Lord of the Rings films being one such example. The effort of George Lucas to broaden the scope of the franchise with new ideas, planets and creatures is also something to be commended. He set the stage for the prequel trilogy, which would result in the well-received Star Wars: The Clone Wars TV show and introduce new characters that would become fan favorites, such as the previously mentioned Darth Maul, Count Dooku (Palpatine’s other protege) or the powerful Jedi Knight Mace Windu. One sign pointing to the film’s improved reputation was the fact that the re-release this month of the film in theaters to celebrate its 25th anniversary actually earned a respectable box office haul.

The release of later Star Wars films would have the franchise move away from this era and take us to the future of the Skywalker saga, some 30 years after Return of the Jedi. Starting with The Force Awakens, it was obvious that Disney wanted to go back to the roots of the original trilogy as opposed to Lucas’ prequels. I think the results were mixed, as The Force Awakens has a simpler plot that was similar to A New Hope, but is also somewhat too derivative of it. The prequels told a new story in the Star Wars universe starting with Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, while the sequels seemed to retell the story of the rebels against the empire, although I do think that Episode IX really pushed the story forward and ended things on a good note.

However, one area where the sequels improved on is the overall look the films, as they seemed to blend the use of practical effects with CGI, which made things seem more grounded. Whereas with the prequels, they did sometimes go overboard with CG effects. While groundbreaking as previously mentioned, it did give things a strange look, with an overload of visuals and backgrounds that in some scenes, were obviously a green screen and look dated today in some instances.

Despite all of that, Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace is a very important film in the saga and in the genre as a whole as it popularized the idea of prequels to popular movies and reintroduced Star Wars to a whole new generation of fans who have since enjoyed a renaissance of the franchise that is still being being enjoyed to this day.

C.S. Link

10 comments on “Looking Back At Star Wars Episode One: The Phantom Menace 25 Years Later

  1. It’s nice to see the prequel trilogy enjoying a bit of a resurgence now. At the time I wasn’t a big fan of them tbh, especially the Phantom Menace, but the film has actually grown on me over time. The film could never live up to the hype and anticipation that built up around its release, but in many way it became an introduction to Star Wars for a whole new generation. Its not perfect, but nowhere as bad as its rep.

    • Well said! As flawed as the prequels were, they did not deserve the over the top scorn they received by disappointed fans who expected too much. A lot of that was due to the hype and marketing machine that sold the prequels, especially The Phantom Menace, as the greatest thing ever. Thankfully, the films’ reputation has improved significantly.

  2. A great review. I’m not a huge fan of Star Wars, but I definitely agree with you on The Phantom Menace. In general, I also consider the prequels to be rather underrated. I grew up watching “Attack of the Clones” and have fond memories of my experience. While these movies may not be as great in quality as George Lucas’ original trilogy, they were still incredibly important in their own way. Recently, I had a chance to watch “Star Wars: The Force Awakens” and absolutely loved it. Being a newcomer to the series, this was the movie which really awakened my love for Star Wars. Here’s why I loved it:

    "Star Wars: The Force Awakens" (2015)- Movie Review

    • I get the feeling that just like the prequels are better revered these days so too will the Disney sequels, especially by those whose first cinematic Star Wars experience was with them.

  3. It had some good parts- meeting Anakin as a child and wondering how he’d turn evil, the sacrifice of his mother, and getting to know a young Obi-Wan- that balanced out the bad aspects.

    • The film was decent it was just a victim of unrealistic expectations and an out-of-control marketing machine. I remember at that time the film wasn’t plastered everywhere. It was bound to disappoint many.

      • I think the most realistic expectations, certainly expecting the unexpected, work better for the kinds of sci-fi legacies that we know for sure would be daunting tasks, as with the modern Dr. Who, Star Trek: The Next Generation and the several Twilight Zone reboots. Fans might easily be mixed in their responses to the changes made. Or even to certain elements remaining the same. But the big hype about more Star Wars, indeed marketing issues, may understandably cloud some people’s judgements.

  4. There have been several films, certainly sci-fi films, that even for their inevitable low points at the time are better appreciated later on. My main issue was how it tended to deprive fans of the mysteriousness about the Jedi that I think was a key factor in the enjoyments of the original trilogy. It’s always good to learn more about the Jedi. But I prefer the mysteriousness to be somewhat more predominating for such aspects of the sci-fi universe.

    • Explaining the Jedi and the Sith always came with risk but doing so was inevitable because if no elaboration was given in the prequels you can bet there woukd have been an outcry demanding more answers about the Jedi and Sith. Of course if the explanation had been better done instead of Midicchlorians, fans would have been more accepting.

Leave a reply to scifimike70 Cancel reply