The MCU Surges Ahead At D23

Perhaps all the talk about superhero fatigue in fims and TV shows may have been premature. At this weekend’s D23 Expo, Marvel Studios surged ahead with impressive announcements for its Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), and this comes fresh off the studios’ massive success of Spider-Man: Brand New Day.

In the past few years, the MCU and other live-action superhero franchises have struggled with general audiences as many films and TV shows failed to capture the stunning success they experienced in the 2010s, as seen with Marvel Studios’ films last year. While that idea may have some merit, what is becoming clear is that at least with Marvel Studios they have course-corrected and laid the foundation for its comeback, which is starting to bear fruit.

It is true that recent MCU projects (putting aside the new Spider-Man film) were not resounding successes, they were well received by critics and fans as seen with Daredevil: Born Again, Wonder Man, Thunderbolts* and Fantastic Four: First Steps, which helped to rehabilate the MCU’s reputation. By the time these properties made their debut, the MCU had developed a lukewarm reputation thanks to subpar films and TV shows like The Marvels and Secret Invasion. Marvel Studios in the early 2020s was forced to produce a glut of projects that were not well executed and the MCU suffered as a result. But thankfully, Marvel Studios president Kevin Feige pulled back on output and emphasized quality over quantity and that is now starting to pay off. More importantly, people began to realized that MCU films and TV shows were back to being great.

The clearest sign of Marvel Studios’ renewed success of course comes from Spider-Man: Brand New Day. The latest Spider-Man film has astonished everyone by how successful it has become as it has just eatned over $2 billion in the box office. The film clearly proves that superhero film fatigue talk was premature and demonstrated that the only fatigue that existed was for mediocre films. While in the past, the film studios could get away with putting out inferior films, that no longer works. Put out a quality film with a popular character then it will be successful. Spider-Man: Brand New Day established that the character is one of, if not the most popular superheroes around and the film could be heralding a new golden age for the MCU. It has helped reignite interest in the MCU, which bodes well for Avengers: Doomsday and beyond.

There was a lot of doubt that Marvel Studios could inspire much interest in the upcoming Avengers film and questioned how the film’s villain, Doctor Doom, did not have the kind of lead up that Thanos had with the early MCU films. These questions appear to have been dispelled as seen with the reaction to the new trailer released during D23, which was previously shown at Comic-Con, and focused on Doctor Doom. There is a lot of intrigue behind the villain and the reason for his crusade, not to mention with his power scale as seen in the new trailer when he effortlessly brushed aside Thor’s attack and raised an army of robotic sentinels to attack the Avengers. Right now fans are pouring through every frame of the trailer and every nugget of leaks and rumors to find out what happens in the film and with its sequel Avengers: Secret Wars, not to mention which characters will appear in both films. But one set of characters has everyone especially excited.

Ever since Disney acquired 20th Century Fox and the rights to the X-Men, Marvel and MCU fans have salivated over the idea of the mutants joining the MCU…and grown impatient. Despite having the rights to the X-Men, Marvel Studios was slow with introducing mutants into the MCU, but that has changed and started with the introduction of….Spoiler Warning for anyone who has not seen Spider-Man: Brand New Day….

Jean Grey, one of the founding members of the X-Men and portrayed by Sadie Sink.

At D23, Feige introduced the director of the upcoming X-Men film, Jake Schreirer, who was rightfully rewarded for his work on Thunderbolts* with this plum assignment. Sink was introduced on stage as one of the stars of the X-Men film and more actors were presented, such as Kit Connor as Cyclops/Scott Summers, Maya Boyd as Storm/Ororo Munroe, Samara Weaving as Emma Frost, Inde Navarrette as Anna Marie/Rogue, Christopher Abbott as Professor X/Charles Xavier, and Adam Driver (appearing on video) as Mr. Sinister/Nathan Milberry. The announcements left out other characters like Beast, Iceman, Angel and Magneto, though it’s not known at this time if they will appear in X-Men, which comes out May 5, 2028. What was refreshing about Driver plaing Mr. Sinister is that the film won’t go with the usual route of Magneto being the main villain.

Expect a full cast for X-Men to be revealed later on, perhaps with another day-long YouTube video featuring chairs with names on them. Or that may be reserved for Avengers: Secret Wars which is expected to have an even larger cast than Avengers: Doomsday. Speaking of the Avengers: Doomsday cast, once again we were teased with Hugh Jackman and Ryan Reynolds possibly appearing in the film as Wolverine and Deadpool. This has not been officially announced, and there is no word if Tobey Maguire will appear as the OG Spider-Man, but this is driving everyone insane by now.

Even though everyone is excited by the coming slate of MCU films, many are concerned about the apparent demise of MCU TV shows on Disney+. After VisionQuest and the third season of Daredevil: Born Again there have been no announcements at D23 of anymore live-action MCU TV shows. This was made worse with the recent cancellation of Wonder Man even though a second sesaon was announced a few months following the positive reception it received. It has been reported in the Hollywood trades that Disney is pivoting away from live-action MCU and Star Wars TV shows because they appear to be diluting the brands and affecting the box office numbers for the films and the costs for producing them are too high. This is regrettable because Marvel Studios has produced some genuinely terrific TV shows. The problem they had goes back to the early 2020s with the Disney mandate to produce a glut of product which led to many terrible TV shows being produced. This clearly hurt the MCU brand and could have been remedied by cutting back and concentrating on producing permium TV shows like HBO does. This can work as we saw with Daredevil: Born Again and VisionQuest which looks like it will be great as well. There are rumors that Marvel Studios will produce one-off special presentations like Punisher: One Last Kill or Werewolf By Night, and will supposedly feature the Defenders and Strange Academy, as well as a sequel to Werewolf By Night. At least it’s something, but Disney is foolish if they completely abandon MCU television.

On a more positive note, it’s a relief to feel genuine excitement for the MCU and its upcoming projects. Any doubts about the MCU have been thankfully dispelled for now. Of course, helping to get rid of any concerns for good is if Avengers: Doomsday turns out to be great and makes a ton of money, which it will, as long as the film is well received by fans and critics. Otherwise, it could wind up like Avengers: Age of Ultron, which while it was financially successful, it dampened enthusiasm for Avengers films until Avengers: Infinty War came along. If Avengers: Doomsday ends up being a hit, and who knows if it can match or exceed the runaway success of Spider-Man: Brand New Day, expect enthusiasm to go into overdrive for Avengers: Secret Wars and beyond.We can’t wait!

José Soto

The MCU Moves Ahead From Hall H

After skipping out of the San Diego Comic-Con last year, Marvel Studios made a welcome return to the convention yesterday to Hall H with tantalizing announcements that point the way forward for the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).

The announcements were not on par with past announcements like Robert Downey, Jr. playing Doctor Doom in Avengers: Doomsday or revealing a mammoth list of upcoming projects. But Marvel Studios did put on a good presentation for the public with exclusive footage from this week’s release of Spider-Man: Brand New Day and this December’s Avengers: Doomsday, along with an impressive roster of actors from the latter film appearing on stage along with Marvel Studios president, Kevin Feige and the directors of the new Avengers film, Joe and Anthony Russo.

What caught everyone’s interest was an appearance by Ryan Reynolds playing Deadpool who popped out of the audience and teased the cast as to why Thor was crying in a cryptic scene from Deadpool & Wolverine–a question that was leveled at Paul Rudd who plays Ant-Man. The question while playful had dark undertones with the implication that Ant-Man will die in Avengers: Doomsday. There was also the question that everyone had about whether or not Deadpool will appear in the Avengers film. So far, the answer appears to be no, but Reynolds did reveal in a recent interview that there are plans for a new Deadpool film.

The last announcement made by Feige after the Avengers: Doomsday presentation ended did not surprise anyone: a third Black Panther film coming in December 15, 2028, to be directed by Ryan Coogler. What blew the roof off the hall was that the announcement that Black Panther will be now played by David Jonnson. Genre fans will recognize him from his appearances in Alien: Romulus and The Long Walk. This was very welcome news given Johnson’s natural charisma and acting talent, and frankly he was the best part of those films. So him playing T’Challa’s grown up son who picks up the mantle of the Black Panther, plus Coogler’s revelation that Black Panther III will be filmed in large format film amped up interest in this film.

The most surprising revelation at Hall H was the announcement of a new Ghost Rider starring Ryan Gosling, to be directed by Shawn Levy and slated for release in 2028. Apparently Gosling and Levy’s collaboration in next year’s Star Wars: Starfighter went so well that they are teaming up again for the MCU. It was not revealed which version of Ghost Rider Gosling will play but expect him to play the original Johnny Blaze version. It’s interesting to note that the actor is married to Eva Mendes who appeared in the original Ghost Rider film in 2007 and it would be nifty if she appears in the reboot. Some have concerns that Levy who is known for more lightweight films will be directing a film that should be more horror based given the superhero’s horror roots. Regardless, nearly everyone is excited by the idea of Ryan Gosling playing Ghost Rider as many have fan casted throughout the years. As long as it turns out better than the original and it doesn’t end up being unfilmed like what happened with Blade. Hopefully Feige and Marvel Studios know better now and seems to have since at least a director has been locked in and not just the lead actor.

Regarding the MCU TV shows, no major announcements or trailers were released. The only thing mentioned by Feige was that VisionQuest will conclude the Wanda trilogy. Most likely the big announcements about MCU TV shows (and trailer releases) will be done at the D23 Expo on August 14.

It’s also worth mentioning that despite speculation there won’t be any secret MCU films planned for between Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars, the latter of which won’t be a two-part film. Another thing missing from the Marvel Studios presentation was any news about the new X-Men film. That could be due to the fact that there isn’t a full cast and the desire to keep Sadie Sink’s character in Spider-Man: Brand New Day a secret for a while longer (the popular theory is that she is playing Jean Grey, a founding member of the X-Men). Apparently, Marvel Studios is keeping its cards hidden in order to avoid the past embarrassment of announcing a bunch of projects that never get made–see Blade, Inhumans, Armor Wars; and this is for the best. Give the fans a few nuggets of information about definite projects when they are ready to be announced.

It’s easy to say that given the failure of several recent superhero films that superhero fatigue is upon us. However, given the excitement of upcoming superhero projects at this year’s Comic-Con that may not be the case.

DCU: Fallout From Supergirl

The relatively new cinematic universe, DC Universe (DCU), got off to a solid start with last year’s release of Superman and two TV shows, Creature Commandos and the second season of Peacemaker. However, the DCU and DC Studios, which produces the DCU films and TV shows, have been rattled by the failure of the DCU sophomore film, Supergirl.

It was hoped by DC Studios that Supergirl’s popular cameo appearance in Superman would translate to a healthy and respectable box office performance with her solo film. No one expected it to earn $1 billion dollars but at least it should have earned $400 to $500 million and help cement the DCU. Unfortunately that was not how things turned out and based on BTS stories about how DC Studios struggled with the film’s poor reception during previews is not a surprise. As the film was being put together the film studio and its head James Gunn saw that Supergirl was not scoring well during previews and the film was hastily edited. This resulted in a movie that felt disjointed in its mood. Sometimes it felt like a gritty and somber Mad Max-style action piece. Other times it seemed as if it was trying to ape the atmosphere of a more light-hearted and goofy space adventure like Guardians of the Galaxy.

This doesn’t mean that Supergirl is a terrible film. It has its faults but overall it was a fine superhero film and certainly cannot be compared to those awful Sony films featuring Spider-Man villains or some of the worst of the former DC Extended Universe (DCEU). But in DC Studios’ situation, the film had to be more than fine, it had to stand out and resonate with audiences. Perhaps if they delayed the film to tinker with it some more in reshoots or editing and released it another time it would have fared better. It is maddening to think that Warner Bros. thought that releasing the film in late June sandwiched between the animated juggernauts of Toy Story 5 and Minions & Monsters was a good idea. They could have released the film in early May where it had no competition. It probably would have still received the same negative to mixed reviews but it might have earned much more than it will now. Traditionally, the early May schedule was reserved for films from the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), but this year, there were no MCU films scheduled with only The Devil Wears Prada 2 in the way.

Despite how much Monday-morning-quarterbacking can go on, Supergirl is in the rearview mirror. Where does the DCU go from here? Is it already doomed? Will James Gunn be removed? To answer the last two questions: no the DCU is not in trouble though it took a nasty black eye from Supergirl’s failure and it is too premature to deem the DCU dead or in trouble, and Gunn’s position is safe…for now. Certainly the next DCU film, Clayface, has to do very well, as well as the upcoming TV show, Lanterns. The success of one or both projects will stem all the negativity the film studio is getting until the big test coming with next year’s Superman: Man of Tomorrow.

Fortunately, the previews for Clayface and Lanterns have been received well, especially Clayface’s. What is helping Clayface is that it seems more like a horror film and will come out at a perfect time to take advantage of that perception. Plus, being perceived as a horror film helps distinguish Clayface from standard superhero/comic book films and this is something that DCU needs at the moment. Meanwhile, Lanterns is being marketed as more of a murder mystery which will annoy Green Lantern fans who expected a traditional space adventure, but the more grounded TV show could pull in viewers who are not traditional superhero fans.

Of course, none of that will matter if Superman: Man of Tomorrow does not perform well. Going for it is that like Superman, it is being directed by James Gunn and the reaction to what has been revealed about it has been positive. Given Gunn’s talent, it is unlikely that the film will get negative reception but it has to do at least as well as Superman and earn over $600 million to keep the DCU viable. Its success also will determine the future of the DCU and James Gunn’s position as head of DC Studios.

Gunn’s contract with Warner Bros. will end next spring and no one can say for certain if he will remain as the president of DC Studios. Many have speculated with Warner Bros. being taken over by Paramount Pictures that it will mean that there will be massive executive changes at Warner Bros. Paramount could take a hard look at how the DCU is performing and demand changes or else. Whether or not Gunn will go along with this is unknown, and it has to be considered that he will be wooed by other film studios, starting with Disney. Do not be surprised if news comes out next year after Superman: Man of Tomorrow is released that Gunn will leave DC Studios to work for Marvel Studios with the intent that he could take it over at some point in the future. If that happens what becomes of the DCU? Who will take over and what direction will it take? Obscure heroes like Booster Gold and the Authority will be disregarded for proven popular characters, that is certain. But do not expect a return of the old DCEU or its creator Zack Snyder despite what some fans wish for.

There are many unknowns but expect a hard shift to focus on Batman as the lynchpin of the new DCU. Given the supposed lack of progress in launching a new Batman for the DCU, Gunn could face pressure to just fold The Batman films into the DCU since the first film, was very successful. The only thing is that that grounded version of Batman will be nearly impossible to connect it to the more bright and goofy DCU that Gunn has created. Of course, all this could be moot if the next couple of films and TV shows succeeds.

It is unlikely that the DCU will be dissolved by Warner Bros. anytime soon. It just got started with only two films under its belt. The cinematic universe has not achieved the disastrous results of the DCEU and still has some good will towards it. Some adjustments will have to be made just as Marvel Studios did and continue to do with their MCU films and TV shows. For one, James Gunn will have to step away from actively directing films and concentrate on running DC Studios. Trying to do both is impossible since running a film studio and maintaining the quality of films is a full time position. He has to devote more time to ensuring that what comes out is above average and deserves to be made, otherwise you end up with another Supergirl. Another thing for Gunn to contemplate is that although he loves quirky obscure characters major DCU projects cannot be devoted to them. He should be paying his full attention to the most popular DC characters like Batman, Wonder Woman, The Flash and so on. It’s fine to feature the quirky characters in films about popular characters like Superman did. Doing so would serve as a testbed for the quirky character and see if they are well received by fans, as what happened with Mr. Terrific, who is being considered for a TV show.

So, is it time to panic for DC Studios? Not yet, it’s early, Warner Bros. and the fans just have to be more patient and see how upcoming projects turn out. Yes, Supergirl is a failure but this experience was an opportunity for Gunn and the film studio to learn from the mistakes and make adjustments. Seeing what worked and what doesn’t will guarantee future success for the DCU going forward.

Five Genre Films For Steven Spielberg To Direct

With the release of the sci-fi film Disclosure Day, fans of director Steven Spielberg have been wondering what will be his next film. It could very well be a non-genre drama or another sci-fi/fantasy film. Whether or not audiences enjoyed Disclosure Day, it is obvious that the film explored one of Spielberg’s favorite subject of his previous films; alien visitation. As he plans for the future he may want to direct a genre film covering a sub-genre he has not done before. Here are five types of genre films that Steven Spielberg could direct.

Time Travel

A time travel film would be right up Steven Spielberg’s alley. In his non-genre films, the director has displayed a stunning attention to detail with historical settings as seen in Amistad, Lincoln, Bridge of Spies, West Side Story, War Horse, and more while injecting those films with a human touch that made them relatable to current audiences. You can even throw in the Indiana Jones films as evidence of his ability to present engaging and authentic voyages to our past. Speaking of Indy, if Spielberg had remained the director of Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny with its time-travel storyline, he would have notched this sub-genre to his filmography.

Now imagine if the director used his cinematic artistry for a time travel film. If he directed films like Timeline, the remake of The Time Machine, The Philadelphia Experiment, or The Time Traveler’s Wife (which he expressed interest in adapting before the film version of the book was eventually made), those films would have been much better made and memorable thanks to his focus on details and exploring the wonder and thrill of actually time traveling, and the dangers and philosophical debates, (think Ian Malcolm in Jurassic Park), as well.

Superheroes!

The closest Steven Spielberg has come to superhero films were the cameos of icons like Batman and Wonder Woman in Ready Player One. At one point he was involved in an announced adaptation of Blackhawk, a comic book character that is more of an adventurer than a superhero and there was a brief rumor a couple of years ago that he was considered for Fantastic Four: First Steps (“sigh” that film would have been phenomenal if he directed it), and early in his career he was offered Superman: The Movie. Another close call for Spielberg was his animated film, The Adventures of Tintin: The Secret of The Unicorn, which was based on the popular comic books which have nothing to do with superheroes.

One obstacle to directing a superhero film, especially one based on a popular character like Spider-Man or Superman is that Spielberg would be under tight creative constraints from film studios and companies that own the rights to the supeheroes. Meaning, he may not want to play with toys that he does not own. Then again he might, given his capability of adapting other works. Another hurdle is that the budget of superhero film based on a popular character would be astronomical when you throw in his salary, and given the struggles superhero films have had lately, film studios may be hesistant to hire him. The best bet is to either work with original characters a la The Incredibles or do adaptations of lesser known, and cheaper, characters. As a suggestion, he would do wonders with an Astro City live-action film.

Space Adventures

The director has turned in some great sci-fi classics but none of them involved space travel, although has come veryclose. Spielberg directed some scenes in Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, was seriously considered for Star Wars: Episode VI: Return of the Jedi, was offered the opportunity to direct Star Trek: Planet of the Titans (before that film morphed into Star Trek: The Motion Picture) and was supposed to direct Interstellar before abandoning the project to Christopher Nolan. Not only is he a vocal cheerleader for the Star Wars films, but has expressed his admiration for Guardians of the Galaxy, which he lists as one of his favorite films.

Being that Star Wars is struggling now, Lucasfilm, if backed financially by Disney, could do a hail mary and get him to direct a future Star Wars film. The same could go for Marvel Studios if they decided to revisit the Guardians of the Galaxy. But in any event, Spielberg doing a grand space adventure taking place on farflung spaceships or exotic planets with weird aliens would be a perfect fit for his skills in conveying grand adventure, mysteries and thrills.

A Stephen King Adaptation

Both Stephen King and Steven Spielberg came into their own in the mid 1970s and throughout the 1980s. It is odd that in all that time the two have not successfully collaborated on a film project. Note the word successfully. In the 1990s, King wrote a screenplay for a remake of The Haunting, which was to be directed by Spielberg. However, the two had creative differences which caused both men to leave the project. Who knows how a Spielberg-directed version of The Haunting would have been; it certainly would have been more memorable than the remake that eventually came out in 1999.

Spielberg has also tried to adapt The Talisman, based on King and Peter Straub’s book. It’s too bad, he didn’t succeed because this film would have been a perfect vehicle for his skillset as a director. Maybe one day soon, this will become a reality, if not with The Talisman, but with King’s exhaustive line of books. Let’s start with The Dark Tower books, at least with The Gunslinger. Spielberg could direct the first film and hand off the rest of The Dark Tower books to other directors.

A Jaws Prequel

Back when Jaws 2 was pre-production, Universal Pictures offered Steven Spielberg the chance to return to do a sequel to the film that made him famous when the film studio had difficulty with the production. Spielberg was interested and wanted to go in a completely different direction. His proposed idea was for the film to be a prequel and focus on Quint and his ordeal as a survivor at sea after the U.S.S. Indianapolis was sunk in the last days of World War II. Quint’s recounting of his struggle in survive shark-infested waters was one of the most haunting and riveting moments in Jaws. It would have been a great opportunity to do something different with the Jaws series which might have fared better in the long run.

Unfortunately scheduling conflicts prevented Spielberg from going through with his idea since he was busy with Close Encounters of the Third Kind. Given how revered the original Jaws is today, and is considered one of Spielberg’s best if not his best film, and how dormant the franchise is since no one with a 100-foot pole is even considering remaking it, why not go with a prequel helmed by Spielberg himself? It would be a unique way for him to return to the IP that made him famous at this point in his career.

It’s not known at this time what Steven Spielberg’s next film will be and he is very busy with his production company. As we know, he has been attached to many projects that either never came to fruition or ended up in another director’s hands, so trying to predict his next work is difficult. Wtih that said, Spielberg is a gifted filmmaker who should stretch himself and try something different in sci-fi, fantasy and horror, and he most likely will do so.

The State Of Star Wars At 49

Today marks the 49th anniversary of the epic sci-fi franchise, Star Wars. Celebrating the occasion was the weekend release of The Mandalorian and Grogu, the first new Star Wars film in seven years. On the surface, this release should be a cause for celebration and a build-up for next year’s 50th anniversary but the film’s mixed reaction is a symptom of the state of the Star Wars franchise at this moment.

There is nothing wrong with The Mandalorian and Grogu, it’s a fine film that is exciting and fun, but given that we have not had a Star Wars film since 2019, one would think that this event would have yielded more excitement from fans. There are many reasons for this and it largely has to do with how Star Wars has fallen out of favor in recent years thanks to lackluster high-profile TV shows that diluted the brand and of course, the backlash against most of the Disney-era Star Wars films. But despite its merits, one nagging issue with The Mandalorian and Grogu is that it doesn’t feel epic. Sure, it has a solid storyline and terrific action scenes and character moments, especially with Grogu himself as he learns to survive on his own and helps rescue his father. But the relatively low-stakes story of the film could have been told in a new season of The Mandalorian. The fate of the galaxy was not in question, the overall storyline of the main characters, Grogu aside, did not advance significantly, and the same went for the worldbuilding. Again it has to be repeated that The Mandalorian and Grogu is an enjoyable film that is better than some of the recent Star Wars films, it just lacks an epic scale.

The Star Wars films are renowned for their topnotch production values and sweeping storylines that touch on mysticism or intriguing worldbuilding. Sure, this has to be well executed or you lose your audience (see the last couple of Star Wars films), but this is epic nature is why people would go out of their way to go to cinemas and spend lots of money to get immersed in an experience that is can’t be replicated at home. Just as important, the plot has to not just engage audiences but build towards an epic story with high stakes. Supposedly, The Mandalorian and Grogu was to be part of a larger storyline that would have continued in other related Star Wars films that would have culminated in a film where the separate characters confronted Grand Admiral Thrawn, but there is little evidence of a larger story in the debut film of the Mandalorian. Except for a plot line about the Mandalorian hired to track down ex-imperial officers, which is resolved fairly early in the film before it becomes a personal story about the armored bounty hunter and his son in a space version of Lone Wolf and Cub. But whether or not other Star Wars films will deal with this Thrawn plot is in question and depends on the performance of The Mandalorian and Grogu.

Trying to use the TV show, The Mandalorian, as a vehicle to explore a larger storyline was what damaged the TV show in the long run. The show worked best when it did not deal with larger galactic situations such as the founding of the New Republic or the return of the Galactic Empire. Part of the problem was that the overarching storyline was not very interesting as seen in Ashoka and the fact that the dull manner in how the New Republic is presented. The show faltered in its third season when the main character and his son Grogu seemed to take a back seat to other characters and their stories that dealt with wider scale situations. The film corrects this by focusing on the Mandalorian and his son, and by doing so it went back to a more personal story for the duo. But this is is not what Star Wars needs at this time.

To recapture imaginations and more importantly improved box office results, Star Wars films have to aim high and tell a compelling story with several characters and intertwined plots. The more personal and intimate storylines seem to work best with TV shows such as the first two seasons of The Mandalorian, Andor, and Skeleton Crew. The next Star Wars film to come out will be next year’s Star Wars: Starfighter, but it’s not known if it will tell that kind of story, but there is sense of excitement for it, and if it turns out well, it should be a fitting film to release in time of the 50th anniversary of Star Wars. But for now, we have a worthwhile film to help celebrate the 49th anniversary of Star Wars as a build up or placeholder for something more epic and befitting of Star Wars.