Let’s continue comparing two television shows that are similar to each other on the surface—Star Trek: Discovery and The Orville. In Part One, we explained how The Orville is an homage to the traditional Star Trek TV show with its set up and characters. Now its time to look at Star Trek: Discovery, which some feel is Star Trek in name only.
When Star Trek returned to the small screen in September 2017 with Star Trek: Discovery, many fans were bitterly disappointed with what they saw. While some criticized the 6th live-action Star Trek show for its flaws, others zeroed in on the fact that this Trek show is not a traditional Star Trek show. They point out that though it’s well done it lacks the essence of what made Star Trek so special. To be honest, they are justified for feeling that way; yes, we all miss the good ol’ fashioned Star Trek with a heroic starship captain (usually a white, male human) and his diverse bridge crew going from planet to planet and solving problems by the episode’s end.
Breaking the Mold of Traditional Trek
While these vocal critics are justified with their objections about Star Trek: Discovery, we must to keep this in mind. Star Trek had to do something different to stand out. By the time the last Trek show, Star Trek: Enterprise, finished its run, Star Trek had run its creative course and fell out of favor with fans who wanted something new and exciting.
During the long hiatus between shows, the return of Star Trek to the small screen was a difficult process as many different ideas were pitched to resurrect the franchise. For a time, Bryan Fuller, a veteran of the previous Trek shows, was the showrunner for Star Trek: Discovery, but ultimately left before it first aired. He did leave his mark with the direction and look of the show which broke the mold of a traditional Star Trek program. On the surface it seems familiar: the adventures of the crew of a starship called Discovery, which takes place a few years before the very first show. But it’s not what fans expected as they found out the newest Star Trek show is a definite contrast to what we think of as Star Trek.
The franchise is known for having an optimistic view of humanity and the future. Discovery instead has a darker, more cynical tone, even more than Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, which for its time was derided for being too pessimistic. This perception is also reflected in the way the show looks. The sets, despite their futuristic look, appear gloomy and cramped. Not the kind of place we’d want to be assigned to if we were at Starfleet. Dutch angles, lens flares and dim lighting accentuate the overall flashy, but depressing look of the Discovery. While all this makes show seem edgy it comes at a cost to the warmer and more inviting look of standard Trek.
Naturally, being that this is a modern show with state-of-the-art special effects and production values, the show looks more futuristic than even the Star Trek spinoffs from its 1990s golden age. Holograms are everywhere and the show’s technology is incredibly high tech. The special effects are just breathtaking and are movie quality. It’s as if mini-theatrical films are being streamed for us. Being that this is a prequel to the original show from the 1960s, this ultra-futuristic look violently clashes with what was established in Star Trek and adds to the argument that the show is not part of the proper Prime Universe.
This is an unfortunate and unavoidable due to time, advances in special effects and larger budgets. While recapturing the exact retro look of the old show works for fan films it would not for a modern show trying to attract more viewers. Still, the perception remains that this incarnation of Star Trek is so dissimilar to the Trek we know that it is hard to believe that it takes place in the prime timeline; not to mention the contradictory background information that some have spotted.
The running arc of the first season of Star Trek: Discovery was of a war between the Federation and the Klingon Empire. The way the enemy race of the Federation was reconceptualized was simply terrible. While the new makeup and ship designs made the Klingons appear more alien and fiercer, it robbed them of the bravado and spunk they were famous for.
A Darker Trek
There was a side arc where the starship Discovery and her crew were stranded in the vicious Mirror Universe, but that story only added to the darkened tone of the show. There was very little exploring. We can count on one hand the number of times the crew actually visited a planet or made first contact. The show oozes with ambiguity and gray areas. One example was a running sub plot in the first season dealt with the use of a new propulsion system called spore drive. It made for a cool and unique look of how the Discovery travelled through unimaginable distances. But to use the spore drive, the ship’s engines needed to use living hosts, which was harmful. First the crew used a living sentient lifeform called a tardigrade against its will, and later one of the show’s characters, Paul Stamets. This was disturbing but the show points out that this new technology helped the Discovery to win the war against the Klingons. This harsher tone was also reflected in the show’s characters.
The controversial lead character, Michael Burnham, is not the starship’s captain, but a disgraced former first officer. In the pilot episode “The Vulcan Hello”, she is responsible for igniting the war between the Federation and the Klingons. Her actions also led to the death of her captain and was guilty of mutiny. The rest of the series features a redemptive story for her as she is recruited from prison to help with the war and the spore drive. Since the show follows her journey, the focus of Star Trek: Discovery is not about the captain. Many have decried having her as the lead given her actions, though others claim that some fans are uncomfortable with the show having a black female lead. Others point out that Burnham should not be shown in a heroic light given her mutinous actions started a war and add that she is too much of a Mary Sue.
The ship’s captain in the first season was the gruff and no-nonsense Gabriel Lorca who seemed more interested in the war than exploring, unlike traditional Trek captains. He quickly became a somewhat controversial fan favorite until it was revealed late in the season that he was from the Mirror Universe and devolved into a one-dimensional villain. Currently, the temporary captain of the Discovery is Christopher Pike who is to help solve a season-long mystery of a galaxy wide phenomenon. This plot line is evidence that the show is moving away from the brutal war footing of the first season and is instead going back to the exploratory roots of the original show.
Star Trek: Discovery has its flaws such as the way the characters behave, and the scripts are not well developed. However, it does have its merits and seems to be improving. So far, the first two episodes of season two “Brother” and “New Eden” have gone back to the traditional mold of featuring sci-fi mysteries and exploring new worlds.
We must remember that many of the previous Trek shows did not hit it out of the park in their first seasons but improved later. Look at Star Trek: The Next Generation, which had a disastrously dull first season, but eventually found its footing and flourished. There still is time for Discovery to find its own groove. Will Discovery improve and become well regarded in the future? It’s too early to tell.
Now as to comparing it to The Orville, that is another matter. The fact is that both programs are very different from one another, so determining which one is better depends on one’s own preference. As the cliché goes, it’s comparing apples to oranges. If you want and miss traditional Star Trek then The Orville is your show, just ignore the sophomoric humor it indulges in at times. If you want something different with Star Trek, then go with Star Trek: Discovery. Frankly, both shows have their merits and we should be able to enjoy both.