Dune is a classic 1965 novel by Frank Herbert that chronicles a feudal family, House Atreides, in the far future that gains control of the desert planet Arrakis (also known as Dune) that has a precious substance called The Spice. They are betrayed by the Emperor of the Known Universe, who conspires with their hated rival House Harkonnen, to seize the planet and kill off the Atreides leader Duke Leto, while his concubine Jessica and son Paul escape to the desert. They ally with the native people know as the Fremen and rebuild their empire with Paul becoming the Fremen’s long awaited messiah to lead them to freedom.
This complicated story has been adapted several times, most recently by Denis Villeneuve with his two-part film adaptation. The very first live-action film adaptation of Dune, however, was done by famed director David Lynch in 1984, whose take on the material was interesting if not always accurate to the book. The lavish production and look of the whole thing was a highlight as well as its all-star cast. Twin Peaks lead Kyle MacLachlin starred as Paul Atreides, and other stars included Patrick Stewart, Brad Dourif, Jurgen Prochnow, Dean Stockwell, and Sting.
The film was basically the same as the book, but there were deviations from it. Most notable was the inclusion of a sound weapon used by the Atreides to battle the Harkonnens. This doesn’t appear in the original book and was somewhat weird to see on the screen. The ending was basically the same but had one crucial difference. After vanquishing the Harkonnen heir, Feyd Rautha, played by a manic Sting, Paul takes control of the empire, and then makes it rain on Arrakis. This is strange as in the book, Paul doesn’t have any magical powers, he just pretends to in order to fulfill the Fremen prophecy of being their “Voice from the outer world”. Nevertheless, Dune as a whole was a good retelling of Herbert’s intriguing tale of outer space intrigue, religion, politics and conflict.
The special effects were somewhat of a mixed bag. The overall look of everything was very good and had the feeling of the book coming to life, but some of the scenes with the enormous sandworms on Dune and the Spacing Guild navigators do look dated. The costumes were both strange and exotic which was appropriate given that the story takes place tens of thousands of years in the future, although the Imperial Sardarkar troops look like they’re wearing garbage bags.
Dune was a struggle to make for Lynch, and subsequently there was an extended edition made without his approval that aired on television. This longer version removed his name from the credits at his insistence and featured new footage and a different opening that explained more of what happened in the years before the film with paintings and a husky voiced narration. This was nice to see for fans of the book who were familiar with what was being described, such as the Great Revolt against thinking machines, but casual viewers might be baffled by it, as some were by the theatrical version. This was probably due to the time constraints of fitting in the whole book into a 2 1/2-hour film. It was inevitable that many of the details of the novel would be lost.
A later TV adaptation on the Sci-Fi Channel in 2000 rectified this as a three-part mini-series that lasted over four hours. This version, sometimes called Frank Herbert’s Dune, was able to be more faithful to the novel, albeit with a lower budget as seen with some of the background scenes that looked like paintings in some instances. The latest adaptations in 2021 and now this year have wisely spilt the book into two parts to have a story that retains much of the book as well as the feel of a big budget, Hollywood production. This seems to be the best of both worlds and their success bodes well for the Dune franchise.
Overall, David Lynch’s Dune does a good job of showcasing Frank Herbert’s story. Lynch basically washed his hands of it after issues with the film studio Universal, but I see it as one of his better films. While it has its flaws, it is still a quality science fiction film that is interesting to watch and still holds a place in the franchise as an alternative look into what happened to the Atreides family in their epic struggle against the Harkonnens and a very unique window into the fascinating Dune universe.
Visionary director Denis Villeneuve’s Dune, Part Two concludes his epic live-action adaptation of the sci-fi classic novel, Dune, with a sweeping flourish. At the same time, by splitting the adaptation into two films Villeneuve is able fully flesh out the scope of the novel, which was impossible to do with just one film, as we saw with David Lynch’s film from 1984.
Picking up immediately after the first film, Dune, Part Two, further develops the saga of young Paul “Muad’Dib” Atreides (Timothée Chamolet), the heir to House Atreides and future messiah to the Fremen people of the planet Arrakis. Now, it must be said that you need to have seen Dune, Part One, or be at least aware of the situations in the story. Basically, in the far future, humanity has spread throughout the universe with the aid of a substance called spice mélange that enables humans to perform complex intergalactic navigation. This spice can only be produced on the desert planet called Arrakis, which becomes the center of a dispute between two royal houses, House Atreides and House Harkonnen. In the first film, the Atreides were assigned by the emperor of the Known Universe to administer Arrakis and harvest the spice, but they were ambushed by the forces of the Harkonnens. This led to the death of Paul’s father, Duke Leto, and with the downfall of his House. By the end of the first film, Paul and his mother, Lady Jessica (Rebecca Ferguson) fled to the deep desert and were adopted by the nomadic Fremen.
If any of this sounds complex, then you are correct, and there is much more to the story. This complexity has made the novel nearly impossible to adapt in the past, yet Denis Villeneuve was able to pull it off while adding his own stamp to the story. It’s similar to what Peter Jackson was able to do with his adaptation of The Lord of the Rings trilogy.
Where the first Dune film was devoted to setting up the complex worldbuilding and multiple characters, the second film centers on Paul’s rise to power as the Kwisatz Haderach, the messianic savior of the Fremen who will liberate their world from outside forces. However, Paul is wracked with doubt because of prophetic visions he has that reveal that billions of people throughout the universe because of his followers. In Dune, Part Two, Paul ingratiates himself to the Fremen and rises to prominence among them as they fight the Harkonnen forces on Arrakis as many of them see him as the fulfillment of the Kwisatz Haderach prophecy. He also begins a romantic relationship with Chani (Zendaya), a brave and lethal Fremen fighter who is skeptical of the Fremen’s religious deference to Paul and even the Fremen religion. It is revealed that the religion was developed by Lady Jessica’s matriarchal order the Bene Gesserit in order to control the Fremen.
Like the novel, the films, especially Part Two, explore the perils of religious fanaticism as it blinds followers who will only see what they want to see. In this case, despite Paul’s early protestations that he is not their savior, many Fremen refuse to heed him and twist their logic to justify their beliefs. The analogies to today’s religious strife are quite obvious and damning but illuminating. Even more incredible is that how closely the film translates the same cautionary themes about religion from Frank Herbert’s novel which came out over 50 years ago, and demonstrates the timeless nature of the book.
There are a few distinct departures from the novel that won’t be spoiled but may upset Dune fans, but the basic plot structure of the novel remains, such as Paul’s development, and the intergalactic politics that turns its attention to the barren Arrakis that turns out to be the most important world in the universe. For non-fans who enjoy rich and intricate political storylines, Dune is basically Game of Thrones set in space, except that it should be the other way around since Dune novel came out decades before the fantasy epic.
While Villeneuve was able to successfully translate the dense story, what is even more impressive with Dune, Part Two is its epic nature that puts other adaptations to shame. Many of its visuals are clearly inspired by Lawrence of Arabia, which itself has many of the same themes as with Dune: an outsider who joins desert people and becomes their liberator.
The visuals and cinematography are just gorgeous to witness, as they engross you completely into the rich alien worlds. Also impressive were the performances by the actors who imbue their characters with complexity. Along with Chamalet and Zendaya, Javier Bardem as the Fremen leader Stilgar and Austin Butler as the psychotic Feyd-Rautha Harkonen were excellent in their roles. Many scenes were heart stopping and instantly iconic, like Paul’s first ride on a giant sandworm, the Fremen attack on the Harkonnens or Paul’s duel with Feyd-Rautha. Together, all these elements have been able to create a true cinematic experience that will be remembered for years to come and prove that serious sci-fi can be a vehicle for a complex and enriching film.
Summing up, Dune, PartTwo is one of the very best sci-fi films ever made thanks to its complex themes and visual richness that rivals the greats. Needless to say, it must be experienced on the biggest screen possible.
Here we go again with the two corporate giants, Sony Pictures Entertainment and The Walt Disney Company, battling over Spider-Man. More specifically the films about the superhero and everyone in his orbit. The colossal failure of Sony’s Madame Web and the delays in producing a fourth Spider-Man film set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) only exacerbated the situation between the two companies.
Past Disagreements
Most Marvel fans know by now the convoluted story of how Sony acquired the exclusive film rights to Marvel Comics’ most popular character, Spider-Man. They also know this meant that Disney’s Marvel Studios could not make its own Spider-Man films. After the failure of Sony’s reboot of Spider-Man in the early 2010s, the two companies decided to share the character and have him appear in the MCU starting with Captain America: Civil War.
Things went well for both companies and the superhero. Marvel Studios produced acclaimed Spider-Man films as the character proved to be even more popular than ever. However, as the saying goes, all good things come to an end. After Spider-Man’s appearances in Avengers: Endgame and his solo film, Spider-Man: Far From Home in 2019, Sony decided to end its agreement with Marvel Studios and prepared to make their own Spider-Man films without the involvement of Marvel Studios and Disney. Following a huge backlash from the public, the two companies decided to play nice and the result was one of the greatest Spider-Man films, Spider-Man: No Way Home. Everything was great. The last MCU Spider-Man film essentially set him up to be a more traditional and grounded loner superhero and plans for a fourth film were underway. This was back in 2021/2022. Nothing has happened since then, and now there are reports of tension between the two companies.
Current Disagreements
Apparently, there are disagreements over the direction of the next Spider-Man film. Marvel Studios has planned a grounded, street-level film for Spider-Man that has him facing off against the Kingpin with appearances by Daredevil and other street-level heroes. However, Sony wants a repeat of Spider-Man: No Way Home where the MCU version of Spider-Man is to reunite with the Sony versions of Spider-Man as the trio would team up for another multiverse story. The reason for this is that Spider-Man: No WayHome was the most successful Spider-Man film and Sony wants more of this. While the idea of expanded multiverses has become part of the Spider-Man comic book mythos, to do the same thing after Spider-Man: No Way Home is creatively lazy and plays it safe. Also keep in mind that the recent releases of Sony’s animated Spider-Man films had similar plot lines where the title character interacted with alternate versions of himself. As tempting as it is to repeat the same thing expecting the fourth MCU Spider-Man film to be just as successful as Spider-Man: No Way Home is wishful thinking on Sony’s part. There isn’t any guarantee that lightning would strike twice. Frankly, doing a grounded Spider-Man story that would be part of a larger MCU storyline where the Kingpin is the mayor of New York City is the logical path for Spider-Man: No Way Home left our hero.
Another issue that is being reported is that Sony wants a Spider-Man film to come out next year. But Marvel Studios has four films already scheduled for release next year and adding the MCU Spider-Man film would strain the bandwidth of Marvel Studios’ resources and be too much for the average filmgoer. This could mean that one of the other scheduled MCU films would suffer at the box office. But Sony does not care, obviously they are only concerned about their own studio, which is desperate for a hit after the failures of Morbius and Madame Web. Marvel Studios could play nice and just delay one of their films next year. But the forthcoming MCU films have already undergone significant delays and Spider-Man will reportedly be a major character in the Secret Wars story, so Marvel Studios is in a pickle over how to go forward.
Sony’s Dismal Track Record
The problem with Sony is that they have proven that they cannot make a good Spider-Man or Spider-Man adjacent film. Yes, the first couple of Spider-Man films done by Sam Raimi were classics but that is largely due to the director, who ended up clashing with Sony over Spider-Man 3 and that film was a letdown compared to the first two films. Aside from an occassional Venom and the animated films, the Spider-Man and Spider-Man-related films were not well done and produced to keep the property with Sony. Apparently, Sony is contract-bound to release a Spider-Man film or one featuring characters in Spidey’s universe every few years. This was part of the reason why Raimi left the Spider-Man franchise because Sony was in a rush to release a Spider-Man film before giving Raimi the time to fully develop it. The tendency of Sony rushing out these films would explain why so many of them are bad. Another culprit is probably studio interferrence because that could only explain why Madame Web was so horrible. Let’s be objective, many of the actors and behind-the-scenes people in Madame Web are clearly talented, but the film was such a bad misfire that reeks of last-minute changes, such as poorly done ADR.
Sony is clearly desperate to create their own cinematic universe as seen with their films like Venom, Morbius, Madame Web and the upcoming Kraven the Hunter. On paper, creating a cinematic universe based on Spider-Man and characters in his world makes sense because throughout the decades the world of Spider-Man has seen many interesting characters that have spun off successfully into their own comic books. But what have we gotten from Sony? Aside from their released misfires, there were attempts to launch their own version of the Suicide Squad only this time with Spider-Man’s enemies, the Sinister Six, which was clumsily alluded to in The Amazing Spider-Man 2; a film about Aunt May as a spy in her younger days (!); and the character everyone has been clamoring for: El Muerto. Seriously, Sony, WTF?! We can understand a film about the Black Cat teaming up with Silver Sable, (which fell apart) but El Muerto? And the upcoming Kraven film has him as some kind of anti-hunting hero who gets his powers from being bitten by a lion! “Sigh”
Clearly, Sony does not know what to do with its superhero cash cow. The problem is that Sony’s ineptness is harming the MCU brand. How can this be? The Sony films are set in different universes except for the MCU Spider-Man films, which is what most fans would point out. But the average person would not know the difference. There are people who still confuse the Marvel films with the DC films! They’re not going to look at the fine print in marketing to see that Morbius was made “In Association with Marvel”, they’re going to see the Marvel logo and think that garbage Sony film is part of the MCU. This has a negative impact on Marvel Studios since the average moviegoer will think the inferior Sony films are made by Marvel Studios, which is the last thing Marvel Studios wants now that they are struggling to come back from recent setbacks with their own products.
Marvel’s Options
What can Disney and Marvel Studios do? Ignoring the Sony films is not working. Well, Disney can try to buy back the film rights to Spider-Man. Naturally, Sony will understandably be hesitant to give up its cash cow unless Disney pays them handsomely. But given the company’s financial hurdles, it’s doubtful Disney has the funds readily available for that feat. Disney can sue Sony with the argument that Spider-Man is so entwined with Marvel that the Sony films are hurting the Marvel brand even if future MCU films completely ignore Spider-Man.
Can Sony be forced to sell the rights back to Disney or at least be forced to remove the Marvel name from their marketing? Who knows at this point, but this cannot continue. Of course, the easiest way to get Sony to relinquish or loosen their hold on the rights would be for people to stop seeing the Sony Spider-Man and Spider-Man-related films. This includes Venom and the animated films. Sony has to be convinced that holding on to the film rights is not worth it if there are diminishing returns for these films. After all, it was the failure of The Amazing Spider-Man 2 that coerced Sony to negotiate with Marvel Studios to bring Spidey into the MCU. So, the ball is in our court.
Now that the constant speculation about who would be cast as the Fantastic Four has ended (thank God!), we can officially get pumped for the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) version of the Fantastic Four. With the casting out of the way for the core cast, the production has time to fine-tune the film, as seen with recent news that the film was being rewritten. Thanks to the failures of the previous film versions of the Fantastic Four, there is a a lot of pressure for the MCU version to get it right because it has to at this point.
Given that the Fantastic Four comics launched the so-called Marvel Age of Comics back in the 1960s and is considered one of the premier properties of Marvel Comics, it is outlandish that past efforts to adapt the superhero team into live-action films failed. Yet, here we are. As fans know, the first effort was an unreleased adaptation in the early 1990s that was produced with barely a budget in order for the producer to retain the film rights to the property. That monstrosity was as bad as its reputation and makes Madame Web look like Logan in terms of quality or lack of. The Tim Story duology that came out in the 2000s captured some of the spirit of the comic books, but lacked the gravitas to elevate them to top-tier superhero films. And the less said about the cloud thing called Galactus the better. The worse mainstream adaptation had to be 2015’s Fant4stic, which is how marketing stylized the film logo. The last version of the Fantastic Four basically tanked the career of its director Josh Trank, who had the bizarre idea to make his Fantastic Four film a body-horror film without any of the humor and charm the comic book team was famous for having.
Thankfully, now that Marvel Studios and Disney have the film rights to the Fantastic Four, they can give the property the attention it needs to create a high-quality superhero film. To do that, Marvel Studios has to evoke the qualities that made the comic books so beloved, especially the ones from the 1960s. At the same time, The Fantastic Four has to appeal to audiences in order to get them into theater seats. The cast, which includes Pedro Pascal as Reed Richards/Mr. Fantastic, Vanessa Kirby as Sue Richards/Invisible Woman, Ebon Moss-Bachrach as Ben Grimm/The Thing and Joseph Quinn as Johnny Storm/The Human Torch, are a solid first step, now it is up to the script and the director to bring the Fantastic Four to life. Here are four things The Fantastic Four must accomplish in order to succeed:
Find the Right Balance With Humor, Family and Awe
The two different film versions of the Fantastic Four were flawed in that they either lacked any humor or humanity, or were too goofy and did not aspire to greatness. The Tim Story Fantastic Four films had plenty of humor and most of it worked, especially the interactions between Johnny Storm and Ben Grimm. But the flaw of those films was that they didn’t really aim higher. The films diminished Doctor Doom and had him being a petty businessman instead of the intimidating ruler of Latveria. What’s worse was that efforts to present something incredible lacked any real scope. The worst example was the Galactus storyline in the second film that reduced the cosmic villain into a giant gas cloud. Blame the budgets.
Now the Josh Trank Fantastic Four film was completely the opposite in that it lacked any humor and charm. The entire film was a dire and dark affair where the characters moped about their newfound powers and were forced to work for the military. Nothing in the film was cheerful or bright, nothing at all like the comic books. Those comics exuded optimism while dealing with challenges. Yes, the team often bickered and fought with each other, but they came together at the end because they were a family. The Trank film did not reflect this family aspect at all. It did not help that the characters were mistakenly cast as young adults, but that is another story. The Fantastic Four has to capture the wow factor and the family dynamics and the humor that made the comic books so revolutionary.
Explore the Fantastic (Pun Intended)
A major fault with the previous Fantastic Four films was that they lacked the sci-fi scale of the comic books. Yes there were many sci-fi trappings, but they were not anything audiences have not seen before. What was worse was that the production budgets of the films could not capture the epic scale of the comic books. Just look at the wild panels in Fantastic Four Annual #3 when Reed, Ben and Johnny explore the Negative Zone. Or the images in the Galactus trilogy of Fantastic Four #s 48-50 where the Human Torch traverses skyscraper-sized machinery to find a weapon to defeat Galactus. The closest we got to that in the films was in Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer where Doctor Doom stole the Silver Surfer’s powers, which was taken from the comics. Yet, that was completely undone with the finale act where the Galactus cloud showed up.
Meanwhile, the Trank film did not have any of the joy of scientific discovery, even though many of the main characters were scientists. Sure, the characters visited an alien planet, but it was a barren, stormy hellhole that did not inspire any awe, and was more in line with the body-horror aspect of the film. But what made things worse was that the film had a low-budget feel. The Fantastic Four needs a huge budget and the best resources to pull off the mind-bending world of the Fantastic Four. This is not an easy feat given the difficulty of trying to pull off the stretching powers of Mr. Fantastic. In other words, The Fantastic Four has to and will be a true MCU epic with the budget and resources it needs to properly adapt the fantastic (yes, pun intended) feel of the comic books.
Do Not Have Doctor Doom as the Main Villain in the First Film
While Doctor Doom is the premier villain for the Fantastic Four and Marvel Comics, he has been overused in the past films. What was worse was that the depictions of the Latverian ruler in the films were not at all accurate. The filmmakers mistakenly tied the origin of Doctor Doom with the Fantastic Four, which was not the case in the comic books. But in the films the villainous doctor was involved in the same accident that gave the FF their powers, which in turn gave him some kind of electric powers, which was never shown in the comics. These reimaginings omitted his genius intellect that enabled him to master science and sorcery to be able to nearly conquer the world. Nor was his status as ruler of Latveria even a factor.
Doctor Doom has been misused in the previous films and he needs to be faithfully depicted if he is to be the main baddie of the MCU and the Secret Wars event. He should only appear in The Fantastic Four as a cameo, and in other MCU productions in the same way Thanos popped up here and there in early MCU films. As for which villains the FF should confront in the first film, well, supposedly Galactus and the Silver Surfer will be the foes, although it may be too early to confront them. It would have been better if a film trilogy built up to them. Other villains to make life miserable for the Fantastic Four could be Annihilus, the Molecule Man (a major character in Secret Wars), the Super-Skrull (though Secret Invasion ruined that), the Red Ghost, the Mad Thinker or even the Frightful Four. Or the sequels could have the team facing a villain not usually associated with them. A sequel film would also be a perfect way to bring back Namor since he was a major villain that the team fought in the early comic cooks.
Make the Characters Relatable
The Fantastic Four comic books, thanks to Stan Lee’s writing and Jack Kirby’s pencils and stories, were able to present outlandish and jaw-dropping sci-fi visuals while retaining a sense of humanity. Who could forget those intricately drawn panels of Reed’s room-sized machinery? Sure they were dazzling, but the focus was on the characters bickering in those same panels like a dysfunctional family. The Fantastic Four has to incorporate this aspect of family into the film.
Despite the faults with the Tim Story Fantastic Four films what they got right was a sense of pathos as seen with moments were Ben struggles with being the Thing. A perfect example was a scene in the first film where he was not able to pick up his wife’s wedding ring because his rock-like hands lacked dexterity. Then again the film was able to have some fun with Ben when one of the final shots of the first film showed him wearing humongous, custom-made sneakers. Meanwhile, with the Josh Trank film it was difficult to relate to the characters, even the Thing, who barely stood out as a character. The caustic, but loving relationship between Ben and Johnny, while done accurately in the Story films, was absent in the Trank film. That is except for one line at the end of the film where Johnny came off as a mean-spirited A-Hole when he mocked Ben.
If The Fantastic Four focuses on the characters and their family relationship, gives us a sense of wonder and adventure, while featuring villains other than Doctor Doom, then it will succeed. It’s just that simple. Fans will flock to see the film if it has these aspects that made the Fantastic Four one of the most popular superhero teams in comic books.
By now most Marvel fans have seen the eagerly awaited trailer for Deadpool & Wolverine, the sole offering from Marvel Studios this year. Just the fact that so many people were anticipating this trailer is alone to demonstrate that superhero fatigue is not necessarily upon us, especially when it comes to the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU).
Sure, the MCU and Marvel Studios had its struggles recently, as seen with failures of The Marvels and Secret Invasion and with behind-the-scenes dramas. However, the higher ups at Disney and Marvel Studios acknowledged that things were not working with the MCU and they took corrective actions. Marvel Studios’ president Kevin Feige took a long look at what was being filmed and realized that several projects were not working, at least up to MCU standards. As painful as it was, Feige delayed the release of projects like Daredevil: Born Again and Captain America: Brave New World to basically scrap what was filmed and start over. This is a costly gamble without any guarantee of success (see Solo: A Star Wars Story), but it had to be done. Disney also realized this and the fact that there was too much MCU product, which led to many projects been held back or cancelled. While many fans did not like this, it was what the MCU needed in order to 1) give the coming MCU projects the time to be improved and not rushed and 2) creating demand and anticipation for the projects.
During the past few months, the common theme among trades and the online was that the MCU and superhero films were in decline, given the fact that most superhero films in 2023 did not perform well. Another argument for the decline was the poor reception to the coming Sony films based on Spider-Man properties like Madame Web and Kraven the Hunter. But declaring the superhero films to be in decline may be premature. Of course, they are not as popular as they were around 2018-19, but at that period the Infinity Saga was reaching its climax and everyone wanted to know how the Avengers were going to defeat Thanos. In the years since, the MCU films have had to start all over again with a new storyline, the Multiverse Saga, which has had a rocky start due to many reasons. They range from the COVID-19 pandemic, the reign of Disney CEO Bob Chapek, who demanded too much MCU product and overstretched Marvel Studios, the writers and actors strike from last year, and the firing of actor Jonathan Majors, whose character Kang was supposed to be the next main MCU villain. Thankfully, many of them have been dealt with or are behind Disney and Marvel Studios.
As Marvel Studios reassessed what worked and what did not with its recent projects, the film studio had the time to tweak its upcoming projects to improve them. This has led to Kevin Feige taking more control of the MCU films and TV shows to ensure that the projects match the quality of the previous MCU films.
Now Disney and Marvel Studios have stated that they intend to focus on quality not quantity, which means they are scaling back on what they greenlight and not just any Marvel Comics property will make the transition to live-action. This is great because it allows the film studio to focus on its most popular characters and devote time and resources to more obscure characters to help them stand out (see Guardians of the Galaxy).
In the recent past, quality films and TV shows have found their audiences as seen with the success of Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 3 and the second season of Loki. This will most likely occur with Deadpool & Wolverine given that it looks bonkers with its fourth-wall breaking and the zany and raunchy humor of Deadpool that does not seem watered down even though the film is from Disney. Deadpool & Wolverine could help change the direction that Marvel Studios is headed given its high anticipation. v
Also creating high anticipation for Marvel Studios is Daredevil: Born Again, which has excited many fans of the original Netflix production since it now features beloved characters from the Netflix shows. Then there is the over-the-top speculation on who will be cast in the Fantastic Four film coming out next year. Oh, and by the way, Marvel Studios: announce the cast already! Its not just the casting that has many excited about the Fantastic Four, but the fact that Kevin Feige is directly involved with the film and is a passion project for him given that past live-action efforts did not perform well.
Of course, another thing exciting fans is the coming of the X-Men in the MCU, which was teased in The Marvels and the mutants will be front and center in Deadpool & Wolverine. Frankly, it’s about time. Disney has had the rights to the X-Men characters for several years and although it was for the best that they took time for the memories of the Fox version of the X-Men films to dissipate, it’s time for them to appear in the MCU. Thankfully we’re getting that with Deadpool & Wolverine as the trailer clearly shows that not only do we see mutants but images of the MCU films and the Time Variance Authority from Loki.
Yes, it’s great to be excited about the MCU again and we have Deadpool & Wolverine to thank for that. Please, be great!
Starloggers 