Tag Archives: Matt Reeves

Oct 7 2026

The Batman, Part II Dilemma

Well Batfans we will have to wait longer for The Batman, Part II. As most Batfans know by now, filming for The Batman, Part II has come to a screeching halt because its director Matt Reeves had to leave production due to a family matter. As troubling and concerning this news is on a personal note for the director, it is admittedly frustrating for those who have being impatient for a sequel to The Batman.

Ever since February 2022, people who loved The Batman have been clamoring for a sequel, which was announced in April of that year, but it has been hit by delay after delay. The delays began when it was moved from October 2025 to October 2026 (this month) to October 2027 and finally to February 2028. There have been many reasons for the delays.

Let’s start with the crippling strikes from writers and actors that delayed nearly all film and TV productions in the early 2020s. Then there is the fact that Matt Reeves is a meticulous writer who wanted his script for the sequel to be just right. This is to be commended and a testament to his talent that Warner Bros. and DC Studios let him take his time with the script. After all, it took Reeves five years to complete his script for The Batman and his efforts paid off as his film was highly acclaimed and rivaled Christopher Nolan’s Batman films in terms of quality. The film also resonated with fans for its gritty and grounded take on the Caped Crusader in his younger years.

One odd thing with Reeves’ Batman films is that they are competing with DC Studios’ still-unfilmed version of Batman. As of now, there aren’t any concrete plans for a production start of The Brave and the Bold, an exploration of Batman’s relationship with his partner/son Damien Wayne/Robin. To not cannibalize each other, both films could not be released around the same time, and DC Studios head, James Gunn, supported Reeves with his film and seemed willing to pause work on the DC Universe (DCU) version of Batman until Reeves was finished.

Filming was underway for The Batman, Part II (it began in June of this year), and was about two-thirds done when the director had to leave the production. So, what now?

Essentially, we wait. Yes, this is frustrating to many but let’s be real here, personal and family matters are infinitely more important than some film. Reeves should be commended for putting his personal matters first and he should take all the time he needs to attend to his situation and we all wish him well. Anyone else who disagrees just because they can’t get their film any sooner just needs to grow up. We all went through delays during the pandemic and the strikes and it all worked out in the end. So, this isn’t any different.

Of course, Warner Bros. may choose not to wait if Reeves does not come back to the director’s chair and the studio will have to decide how to proceed.

Currently, the film is still scheduled to be released in February 2028 so perhaps Warner Bros. expects Reeves to return to work fairly soon. Then again, Reeves may have to be out a lot longer than expected. The studio could cancel the film, but that would be unwise given the popularity of Batman, and the resources sunk into the film already. We are past the age of disregarding genuinely good films like Coyote vs. Acme for tax write offs. Another director could step in and complete the filming but that idea will give many PTSD over how Justice League turned out. That was where its director Zack Snyder had to leave the film to deal with a family tragedy and was replaced by Joss Whedon, who then turned in a film that was reviled. There are already rampant internet rumors about possible replacements ranging from James Gunn to Andy Muschietti (the slated director for The Brave and the Bold). But it is premature to go there and if that were to happen it would be best to pick a director whose vision and directorial style is similar to Reeves. Possible candidates range from David Fincher, Darren Aronofsky, Gareth Edwards, Guillermo Del Toro or Michael Mann. Good luck trying to get them to agree to undertake such a task.

One thing to consider is that people want a Batman film as soon as possible, and delaying the film any further will dampen interest in it, or increase demand. Just look at what happened with Spider-Man this summer. For all we know, Warner Bros. and Gunn may be planning to fold Reeves’ version of Batman into the DCU or fast track production of The Brave and the Bold to put out some kind of DC film content in 2028.

At this point, it is too early to speculate on how this situation will turn out. But we just have to be patient and wish Reeves well, because no matter what, The Batman, Part II will come out, and it will be worth the wait.

Mar 14 2022

The Batman Is A Powerful, Gritty Look At The Dark Knight

The latest live-action incarnation of DC Comics’ most popular superhero, The Batman, was eagerly awaited by fans and for good reason. Director Matt Reeves promised his version of Batman would actually used his detective skills like in the comics and his film would be more of a gritty crime noir piece. For the most part, Reeves succeeded and delivered one of the most powerful Batman films of all time.

Taking elements from the film Se7en and the comic book mini-series Batman: The Long Halloween, The Batman takes place during the second year of Batman/Bruce Wayne’s (Robert Pattinson) war on crime. As the film starts, a terrifying serial killer called the Riddler (Paul Dano) is killing the rich elite of Gotham City and exposing their dark secrets. This includes crooked politicians and police officers alike. Batman and his only ally in the police department, Detective James Gordon (Jeffrey Wright), work together to capture the Riddler by solving his enigmatic clues before he claims his next victim.

Batman’s detective work leads him to the seedy, underworld empire of crime boss Carmine Falcone (John Turturro) and the criminal elements working for him, such as Oswald Cobblepot (Colin Farrel echoing Robert DeNiro in a fat suit) and Selina Kyle (Zoe Kravitz who redefines sultriness with her version of Catwoman). Their interactions expose many secrets about Gotham, including uncomfortable revelations about Bruce Wayne’s parents. At the same time, Batman starts questioning his vengeance-fueled crusade to rid crime from Gotham as he realizes the Riddler’s macabre vendetta is a dark mirror to his cause.

Unlike previous Batman films, The Batman is more grounded and gritty. Believe it or not, it feels even more realistic than the Christopher Nolan films. Gotham itself is shown to be a bleak and dreary locale without redemption and Matt Reeves revels in exposing it to the audience. Almost all the characters have dark elements in their souls and are tremendously conflicted. Batman most of all, who is at his core, a tragic figure. He is clearly emotionally damaged by the murder of his parents…thankfully this film did not bother to show us yet another version of his origin. Instead, it focuses on the aftermath of their deaths as Bruce has to learn to move past the idea of vengeance and find a more noble vision within himself.

Seeing Batman portrayed as a quiet and intimidating vigilante at odds with the police and displaying his cunning intelligence as he solves riddles was a novel approach and harken back to Batman’s Golden Age crime story roots. Pattinson does a fine job as the determined Caped Crusader and the gaunt Bruce Wayne. Unlike other versions, this Bruce Wayne is a true social recluse who has not yet adopted the outward identity of a charming billionaire playboy and it was an interesting take on the character.

The other actors were also striking in their roles, with Kravitz, Dano and Wright standing out. Dano’s horrifying take of the Riddler is truly chilling and rivals the best portrayals of the Joker. Speaking of the Joker, there is an unnecessary cameo of the Joker in the film which was distracting. We did not need to see the character and his appearance demonstrated one of the film’s weakness.

As powerful as it was, The Batman was bit too long in length, being nearly three hours long. Matt Reeves could have easily trimmed off fifteen or twenty minutes because the film dwelled too long on the intricate subplots of various villains and the corrupt elements of Gotham’s elites. Honestly, the material with the Riddler more than held up the film and those side stories were not needed. It was obvious these elements were put in to set up future films.

Regardless, from the excellent acting to the beautifully haunting cinematography to the thrilling fight scenes, The Batman is quite a neo noir achievement. It is not for everyone, especially younger children and those seeking a light-hearted superhero romp. But The Batman is one of those few films that makes you want to see again and again to discover something new with each viewing.

José Soto

Feb 2 2019

Requiem For A Dark Knight

ben-affleck-as-batman
The status of Ben Affleck’s role in the upcoming Batman film directed by Matt Reeves has been a source of both interest and mystery ever since Affleck left that film’s role as director two years ago. This mystery was finally solved a few days ago with the article on deadline.com that detailed a release date for the film titled The Batman, which will come to theaters on June 25th, 2021 with a new actor to be cast in the role. This was seemingly confirmed by Affleck himself, who retweeted the article on his Twitter account. This news has brought a reaction from fans that of sadness and regret since he will no longer be playing a role that he has owned since his debut in 2016’s Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. The initial announcement of his casting as Batman was met with some skepticism at first, but after the first trailer for the movie, with the image of Bruce Wayne staring at his Batman outfit, consumed with rage, fans were convinced of his ability to play the dual role of playboy millionaire and costumed vigilante, obsessed with stopping what he saw as the ultimate threat in Superman. His excellent performance in the somewhat divisive film cemented his legacy as the definitive live-action Batman. His brief, but well received, cameo in Suicide Squad further excited fans. His last full time appearance as the Caped Crusader in Justice League in 2017 was met with mixed results since he seemed somewhat disinterested. Possibly this was due to reshoots by Joss Whedon and rewrites to the story that changed what the original director Zack Snyder had planned. But, overall, I thought his performance was still a great interpretation of a transformed Bruce Wayne who was trying to live up to Superman’s example and not let his sacrifice in Batman v Superman go in vain. 
I do wish that Ben Affleck was given another opportunity to play the role. However, due to the reaction to both Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice and Justice League, as well as his own personal problems with alcoholism and a high profile divorce, this led to his wavering on whether or not to continue the role. Also complicating things was the fact that Matt Reeves wants to tell a story of a younger Batman that takes place maybe 10-15 years before the events of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. There were some rumors that Affleck might play the older version of Batman at the start and end of the movie, but this seems to have been rejected by Reeves.  His vision of a noir-driven detective film does sound interesting and unique, but it would have been great to see Affleck in this type of film as well, since his previous movies as Batman focused on his fighting abilities and strengths. As for who will replace him, there are, of course, lots of rumors on that as well. One is Armie Hammer, who would be a good replacement. Hammer has been rumored to be up for the part of Hal Jordan in the upcoming Green Lantern Corps film, but that movie is still several years away with Geoff Johns writing a new script for it. Another one rumored is Aaron Taylor-Johnson from 2014’s Godzilla and 2010’s Kick-Ass. Whoever is picked should not be so young as to look more like Robin than Batman. Even though Reeves is supposedly looking for an actor in the range of 25-30, this Batman should already be an experienced crime fighter. Christoper Nolan’s Batman Begins in 2005 already told the story of the Caped Crusader first starting out. Another origin story is not needed. Whoever is cast needs to have the same presence that Affleck had and be able to show that he will eventually become the force that dominated Gotham’s underworld in Batman v Superman.
If there is ever another Justice League movie or another DCEU film that takes place in present day, one hopes that Affleck will be called on to don the cape again, but that is unknown at this point. If he never plays the role again, his legacy is still cemented in comic movie lore as arguably the most accurate Bruce Wayne and Batman to show up on the big screen. Every role is eventually recast at some point. Look at how many actors have played the role of James Bond over the years. Batman is no exception. The character is over 75 years old and will go on no matter who plays him, so while it’s sad that Ben Affleck is leaving, any hysteria over this is not really necessary. I just hope that whoever takes the torch from him is able to live up to the standard he set and helps Matt Reeves make another great Batman movie.
C.S. Link