As a kid growing up in the ‘70s, there were few things cooler than knowing that we landed on the moon. It was a whirlwind era of excitement for kids as we waited for the next moon landing. We had other obsessions in that time like Mego action toys, G.I. Joe figures and TV shows like the Six Million Dollar Man and Space: 1999. But right in the mix was something even bigger: the moon missions-until one day, I noticed we weren’t sending anymore astronauts to the moon.
What happened a few years ago for me at the time was beginning to be a thing of a distant past. IN 1972, the Apollo space missions ended. A lot of us thought they were merely on hiatus. By 1976, we celebrated the nation’s bicentennial but without any further lunar missions as the number of lunar missions that year was a big zero. At a family trip to Cape Kennedy (which had since been renamed by Cape Canaveral, its original name) and the Kennedy Space Center, I remember the experience in awe. They had rockets everywhere and spaceships that sent people to the moon. But what dampened the experience for me was that in my visit, the Apollo era had ended.
Over the years we’ve been through a long stretch of futurist speculations and promises seen on the covers of magazines such as Popular Science and Omni, and sci-fi TV shows. We’ve had robotic missions to nearby planets that captured our imaginations and the space shuttles missions which helped construct the International Space Station. But these suborbital missions did not really captivate us like the Apollo missions since it did not seem like we were advancing towards a permanent presence on the moon and beyond. Setbacks like the Challenger disaster and political squabbles over NASA’s budget didn’t help either. Yes, we made advances with satellites and robotic missions but they seemed uneventful for most of us.
That all changed 54 years after the last Apollo mission when the Artemis II mission reignited that wonder with its 10-day journeyed around the moon and farther out in space than any human has journeyed, which captured sights unseen since time began.
It all started on April 1, 2026 when astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch and Jeremy Hensen launched onboard the Orion spacecraft called Integrity to the moon. In addition to this being the first time humanity left near Earth orbit since the early 70s, the mission established many historic firsts: the first multinational crew to go to the moon, the first woman, the first person of color, the first non-U.S. cititzen and more importantly the furthest out into space that any human has journeyed. This happened during the climax of the trip when the Artemis II astronauts headed out past the dark side of the moon and captured spectacular images that will certainly inspire future generations. Their journey unexpectedly captivated the world as this peaceful mission showed the best of humanity thanks to the personable messages and images the Artemis II crew conveyed to the world from the cramped Integrity. Their voyage provided us with much needed relief and renewed hope for humanity as it is embroiled in needless wars, pandemics, crumbling economies and criminal political leaders. There may be some hope for us, yet.
Now that the Artemis II crew returned safely to Earth, their mission was more than just a historic event—it’s our return to the dreams our generation grew up with, and hope to have again. Just like the Apollo heroes, the Artemis II crew are paving the way of something even bigger—our next leap into space exploration. Alongside our childhood nostalgia, what truly fuels the Artemis II mission is how far we’ve come.
The privatization of space, with players like SpaceX, Boeing and Blue Origin, has opened up competition and innovation with space. Advances in computing, AI, and engineering, plus what we learned from past missions have reignited a new era for space exploration. This will include a lunar landing in 2028 and hopefully the establisment of a moon base in 2030. From there we can start to seriously conisder missions to Mars and beyond within the next few decades. What once was paused after the Apollo misisons ended, have been rekindled as humanity races back to the moon…and goes beyond.
The news about the dire wolf being de-extinct came very suddenly and surprisingly yesterday. The idea of using biotechnology to bring back extinct animals had been the stuff of many imaginative sci-fi stories, notably with Jurassic Park and the films the novel inspired. The announcement by Colossal Biosciences that they actually revived an extinct species now made a science fiction concept a science fact.
The method behind the de-extinction was fairly straightforward. The company extracted DNA from a fossil skull and tooth of dire wolves and was able to analyze the genome. After that, Colossal Biosciences used gene editing on the cells of a gray wolf to create dire wolf embryos and implanted them into a surrogate dog.
The first two dire wolves were born on October 1, 2024 and named Romulus and Remus, and a third one, named Khaleesi, after the Game of Thrones character, was born two months ago. As the pups grew their different physical characteristics from gray wolves were undeniable. Sporting distinctive thick white fur, unusual vocalizations and larger body proportions they still exhibited wolf-like behavior such as stalking, hunting and howling. Fortunately the trio are healthy and kept safe in a private, undisclosed nature sanctuary where they could live in peace.
With the success of the dire wolf being de-extinct, Colossal Bisociences is moving ahead with their plans to de-extinct the thylacine, the dodo bird and the wooly mammoth.
As exciting as this sounds we are still a long way from de-extincting dinosaurs if it is even possible since extracting dinosaur DNA is impossible. There are also ethical issues that have come up with the unbelievable feat by the company. Namely, what is the point of bringing animals back from extinction? We already have a difficult time keeping living species of animals alive in our increasingly crowded world. Where can these animals go? What role will they serve in Earth’s ecosystem, considering that many of their previous roles have been taken by modern animals? Right away, these animals will have to compete with modern animals and humans for resources in an Earth with dwindling supplies and land space. Then there would be intense pushback from people who would not approve of the de-extinction or of re-introducing them to the wild. We have seen this already when wolves were re-introduced into many parts of North America as they threatened livestock.
A likely scenario is that these de-extinct animals would not be allowed to live in the wild and forced to live out their lives in zoos, which would enrage opponents. Then there is the worst case scenario of nature running amok and well, we’ve seen the Jurassic Park and Jurassic World films. In other words, their re-introduction would have unpredictable and unwanted results.
There is the argument that we have no way to know how to properly raise these animals since we can only guess as to how they lived. Romulus, Remus and Khaleesi seem to be behaving like wolves, but is that because they have wolf DNA? This would make them a new hybrid species and not true dire wolves, which are distant relatives of modern gray wolves. The same situation would apply to recreated mammoths and other prehistoric extinct animals. The first mammoths would more likely be Asian elephants with outward mammoth characteristics, and the same would go for the dodo and others.
Colossal Biosciences has stated that they intend to apply their technology to help preserve current animal species such as elephants that are more and more endangered as they face loss of habitats from human encroachment and hunting by poachers.
Despite the legitimate concerns about de-extincting animals there are arguments for doing this. Proponents claim that de-extinct animals can fill in roles that are vacant in ecosystem. For example, the thylacine was an apex predator in Tasmania and Australia and their re-introduction into the ecosystem would help keep in check the populations of prey animals. Other proponents claim that mammoths would be able to help preserve the tundra in Asia with their foraging and in a way arrest climate change. That is very far fetched to be sure, and calls to mind Stephen Baxter’s book Icebones, which was about cloned mammoths on Mars. This argument about using de-extinct animals to keep ecosystems healthy is valid. Also, since humans were responsible for the extinction of animals like the thylacine, Stellar’s sea cow and the passenger pigeon, they have a moral obligation to try to bring back these species if there is a need for them in an ecosystem.
No matter where anyone sides in the argument, it is important to note the responsibility we all bare with using science and co-existing with other species in our fragile world. Still, the revelation that dire wolves have been de-extinct is exciting as it demonstrates that extinction isn’t forever.
The fourth season of the alternate history TV series, For All Mankind, just concluded with a typical speculative flourish that defines the program.
Streaming on Apple TV +, For All Mankind was co-created by Ronald D. Moore and explores a reality where the Soviets reached the moon before the United States could. Instead of stagnating as in our reality, in this alternate world, the United States is inspired to keep pushing the boundaries in space exploration. In each subsequent season, the series jumps ahead roughly every decade and we see how much of an impact the Soviet moon landing has in the world. A lunar station is established in the 1970s, which further fuels the space race between the world powers of the Soviet Union and the United States. Naturally, this also fuels the Cold War which now extended into outer space as seen in season two when the two world powers nearly went to war on the moon during the 1980s.
By the third season, tensions cooled between the two powers in the 1990s. A new space race to reach Mars and the struggles of those who reached the red planet were the focus of the third season. This brings us to the fourth season which just concluded. Taking place in the early 2000s, the fourth season of For All Mankind presents a world where Al Gore is the U.S. president, the Soviet Union continues to exist, John Lennon is still alive and there are only three Star Trek TV shows (!), but as with the previous seasons, the TV show focuses on several characters affected by the alternate space race.
The heart of For All Mankind is the aging astronaut Ed Baldwin (Joel Kinnaman). In the first season, Baldwin had the opportunity to land on the moon on Apollo 10 before the Soviets, but never took it, much to his regret as Alexei Leonov landed on the moon shortly after Baldwin’s mission. Baldwin winds up involved in crititcal points in NASA’s space exploratory efforts such as being commander of the Jamestown lunar station, helping to defuse tensions with the Soviets in the second season during a space shuttle flight, and as the commander of the commercial mission to land on Mars and establish a colony there in the third and fourth season. Despite his many achievements, Baldwin struggles to find meaning in his life, to adapt to a quickly changing world and he does not even want to return to Earth after spending many years on Mars. By the fourth season, Baldwin is facing his twilight years and determined to make a difference. He does this by latching onto the quest to keep the human Martian colony from withering out.
In the fourth season, a large asteroid, called Goldilocks, is discovered drifting towards Mars that is rich in iridium. After a lot of deliberation, the M-7, a conglomeration of seven world powers, including the U.S. and the Soviets, decided to have the asteroid diverted into Earth orbit for immediate rewards and riches. Dev Ayesa (Edi Gathegi), an Elon Musk-type and owner of the corporation Helios Aerospace, has a vision of humanity expanding into the solar system and beyond. He realizes that if the Goldilocks asteroid is diverted to Earth that any interest in developing Mars and exploring space will wither and die as the world powers will be busy enriching themselves with the asteroid in Earth orbit. He comes up with a plan to essentially hijack the asteroid and have it orbit Mars instead in order to force Earth to keep investing in the red planet.
As this is going on, there is a labor struggle in the Martian colony best represented by Miles Dale (Tobey Kebbel), a former oil platform worker turned Martian laborer. In the reality of the TV show, fossil fuels have been phased out of use in the world as new energy technologies made them obsolete. While this may be great for the environment, many workers in the fossil fuel field had to find new means of employment. Dale relocated to Mars for a new opportunity, but the realities and frugality of Helios forced him to run a black market operation in the colony. Underlining these labor struggles is the fact that many of the laborers including Baldwin see Mars as their home not Earth, which means this could be the beginning of Mars eventually becoming an independent world.
Trying to keep the Martian colony running smoothly is Commander Danielle Poole (Krys Marshall), a Black woman who was one of the first woman astronauts for NASA in the 1970s. As Baldwin is the rebellious heart of For All Mankind, Poole is the soul of the show as we see from her POV how radically different this reality is from our own since women and people of color were able to advance in society much more quickly compared to our own. Like Baldwin, Poole is very relatable but for different reasons. While Baldwin is a sympathetic relic struggling to fit into the new order, Poole is an empathic and level-headed, by-the-book leader who is the moral center of the show. As these situations go, Poole is brought out of retirement to command the Martian colony and becomes embroiled in the labor struggle that morphs into a revolution of sorts on Mars.
In the backdrop of the fomenting Martian revolution, we also follow the stories of several NASA personnel. The most interesting is Margo Madison (Wrenn Schmidt), the first woman to be mission controller of NASA. During the TV show she was forced to work for the Soviets and commit treason by providing them with the secrets of American space technology. In the just-concluded season, Margo, who was believed to have been killed in a domestic terrorist bombing, comes out of hiding from the Soviet Union and has to decide what she will do with her life and how she can contribute to humanity’s space efforts. Her situation brings her into conflict with her protogee, Aleida Rosales (Coral Peña), who also is a woman of prominence in NASA.
What makes For All Mankind so captivating to watch is how it balances interesting personal stories with wider geopolical developments in this world that is distinctly different than ours. We see the impact of how a Soviet moon landing further accelerates society and technology. It’s obvious that we have the capability to have advanced in space exploration but our society lacks the drive to take us there. It’s disheartening that while there is a thriving colony on Mars in the TV show, real-life efforts show how far behind we are. We cannot even manage to return to the moon as we learned recently when the Artemis mission was delayed, yet again.
In some ways, even though we see that this is not a perfect society, it seems to be a better world than our own. Many issues have been addressed much earlier in this timeline such as the struggles of people of color , women, and members of the LGBTQ+ community. Advances in techonolgy are casually noted such as the use of the Internet and cell phones which began in the 1980s, and the rapid development of alternatives to fossil fuels. On the other hand, this altered world has its own problems such as it seems as if socialism/communism has spread throughout the world thanks to the continued exitence of a despotic Soviet Union (in the fourth season of the TV show, Gorbachev was overthrown by hard-line communists). One simple but intriguing tool the TV show uses is that of the montage. At the start of each season, a montage quickly brings viewers up to date on developments of the world, such as the results of presidential elections and pop culture news.
These developments would be meaningless if For All Mankind never presented how these events affected its characters. We see the wonders and struggles of this altered world through their eyes and react accordingly. One of the show’s strengths is that is able to smoothly introduce new characters while moving away from older characters as the show jumps ahead in time. It’s unknown if Baldwin and some other older characters like Poole will continue to be a part of the series though it’s unlikely. In a flashforward tease shown in the season finale, we find ourselves in 2012 without any indication if Baldwin and the others are still alive or active. With regards to the fourth season, For All Mankind continued to soar with its look at a past that is more futuristic than our own. Many episodes and plot lines were fascinating and built up to an intense and cathartic season finale.
At this time, it is unknown if For All Mankind has been renewed for a fifth season, though it is one of the more popular TV shows on Apple TV +. Not only would it be great if we’re given a fifth season taking place in the 2010s but a sixth season that takes place in this decade and beyond. Who knows, maybe we’ll see the Jovian system being colonized or perhaps of the first steps to faster-than-light travel as humanity begins to contemplate traveling to other star systems. If all goes well Ronald D. Moore and his colleagues will be able to conclude this captivating look at an alternate world of true space exploration.
The traveling exhibit Star Trek: The Exhibition is currently running through this summer at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) as part of the Center’s Sci-Fi Summer. Showcasing the world of Star Trek, the Sci-Fi Summer program presents how the science fiction world of Trek helped to influence the development of our technology. It’s a great place to go if you are a Star Trek or science fiction fan not just because of the Trek-themed exhibits and attractions but because it melds that sci-fi aspect to NASA’s real life world. You get to see where we’ve been and how far we have to go.
Star Trek: The Exhibition features a scale model of the Enterprise, and the actual props and costumes used in the Star Trek shows and films. At the KSC, the exhibit is broken up into two different buildings. One where IMAX films are shown (and is currently presenting Transformers: Dark of the Moon in 3D) has a room dedicated to the original Star Trek series, though props and costumes from the Kirk-era films can be seen. The highlight is a well-detailed replica of the original Enterprise bridge complete with dedication plaque, consoles and the captain’s chair that anyone can sit on for golden photo opportunities.
At another building near the tour bus terminal is a larger exhibit room dedicated to Star Trek: The Next Generation, as well as Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Star Trek: Voyager. This exhibit displays a mock-up of the Reman Scorpion fighter craft seen in Star Trek: Nemesis and partial recreations of the Enterprise D’s sickbay and engine room. There are models, numerous props and costumes worn and used by the actors and a Klingon chair that you can sit on (there are also captain chairs from the Enterprise B and D but those are roped off). Additionally one side of the exhibit’s wall has a mural with a detailed timeline of NASA and Trek history. The opposing wall displays the costumes. A nice touch to this exhibit were two actors dressed as Vulcans from the far future who stayed in character and interacted with visitors. The uniforms they wore were the ones worn by 29th century Starfleet officers as seen in the Voyager episode “Relativity.”
The KSC has Trek costumes and factoids peppered throughout the facility with several famous delta shield symbol on the grounds that act as arrows to guide visitors to Trek-related exhibits and attractions. For example one path lead sto the rocket garden where a floor painting shows how large the Enterprise ships are in comparison to the horizontally displayed Saturn 1B rocket. It’s staggering to consider how large the Trek ships are when you walk the length of the rocket. There was so much to see at the KSC that one could easily spend an entire day on the grounds. Continue reading →
The space shuttle Atlantis lifted off today on its final shuttle mission closing a 30-year chapter in NASA’s manned space program. Looking around the news casts obsessed with Casey Anthony, the dismal jobs report, and other headlines it was hard to find substantial mention of Atlantis’ mission to the International Space Station (ISS).
This just underscores the sad state of America’s space program and it seems as if the shuttle fleet is being retired with a whimper. It’s almost as if NASA and the government want to downplay the fact that there are no concrete future plans.
After President Obama all but scuttled NASA’s manned space program, the agency has been left grasping at straws to remain relevant. Meanwhile Russia, China and other nations are pushing on with their space efforts. So why not us? Blame it on cost-cutting politicians, an apathetic public and NASA’s bureaucracy; there are plenty of reasons. But it could be traced to a lack of long-term planning.
Back in the 1960s, President Kennedy proclaimed his famous goal of landing a man on the moon before the decade ended. Then the U.S. was in a very public space race with a very competitive Soviet Union. One added impetus was that the Russians were winning. It fired the public’s imagination and will for America to forge ahead despite setbacks like the Apollo 1 tragedy. Once Armstrong and Aldrin landed on the moon, everyone celebrated and collectively went on the next thing. NASA’s budget was slashed and bit by bit the agency’s ambition withered; goals like sending astronauts to Mars by the 1980s went by the wayside. The most recent setback was with Obama effectively killing the agency’s plans to return to the moon in a few years.
Now with the shuttle fleet retired, current plans are to develop a new successor to the mammoth Saturn rockets, building spacecraft that can leave Earth’s lower orbit and vague plans to reach an asteroid by 2025 and orbit (not land on) Mars in the 2030s. Frankly that is too far away in time to capture the public’s imagination. For all the hand wringing by NASA, the fact is that the technology to send people to Mars and colonize our moon exists today, actually it has existed for years. What kept that from happening was the lack of will from everyone. Politicians didn’t want to invest their capital on projects that paid off way into the future, NASA seemed to be more interested in conducting tests in space that the average Joe didn’t care about, and the public complained about the costs and necessity of the space program. In truth, the budget for the space program is very small compared to other expenses. To do away with it completely won’t cure our financial woes.
NASA needs clear goals that regains the public’s interest, and more importantly the drive to push the envelope. It may take another nation pulling off a genuine feat to light America’s fire again. Perhaps commercial space craft development will do it (the company SpaceX has plans for a test run to the ISS this year). Or maybe the sight of American astronauts piggybacking on Russian space capsules might do something to boost our motivation. For now though, the next chapter in the U.S. manned space program is still on the launch pad.
Starloggers 