Category Sci-Fi

Sep 21 2025

Should The Next Star Trek TV Show Be About Kirk?

The powers that be that are in charge of the Star Trek franchise are busy planning a new Star Trek TV show that will feature a young James T. Kirk in his early days as captain of the U.S.S. Enterprise starship. This version of Kirk would be portrayed by Paul Wesley, who appeared frequently in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds and the proposed show would be a sequel to Strange New Worlds called Star Trek: Year One. It’s a great idea since Kirk is still one of the most popular characters in Trek. But should there be another TV show based on Kirk?

Let’s put aside the acting chops of Wesley or the idea of Kirk being recast, which has always been a challenge that producers had to deal with since William Shatner, the original actor to play the role, is ingrained with many fans who have a hard time accepting someone else playing Kirk. Just look at the trouble the production team behind the 2009 Star Trek film went through to cast Chris Pine as Kirk. People have to accept that Shatner will never play the role again, especially since Shatner is in his 90s and the budget to digitally de-age him would be prohibitive for an ongoing TV show.

In Wesley’s defense, he does a good job playing a young Kirk without resorting to Shatner’s unique method of acting that gave lots of fodder for comedians. To get an idea of how Wesley would have aped Shatner, take a look at the season three Star Trek: Strange New Worlds episode “A Space Adventure Hour”. It was one of those by-now obligatory holodeck malfunctioning episodes where Wesley as Kirk played a parody of Shatner’s Kirk. The point is if any actor tried to act like Shatner, he would not be taken seriously, which would doom the show.

Getting back to the idea of a young Kirk TV show. On paper it seems like a natural, do a TV show about a young Kirk settling into his command, making mistakes and learning from them, and seeing how he formed his bond with the famous Enterprise crew. It would be fairly easy to create the show since it would be a sequel to Star Trek: Strange New Worlds and the standing sets and design are already done, so that would save money and time. Plus, many of the actors from Strange New Worlds like Ethan Peck would just transition over to Star Trek: Year One since Peck would be playing Spock, who became first officer of the Enterprise during Kirk’s command. The proposed Star Trek: Year One could also remake some of the more famous first season episodes like “Space Seed” (which would give us a recast of Khan) or “City on the Edge of Forever” but with better production and effects. This is very tantalizing.

The problem is that we saw Kirk’s early adventures in the original TV show. When Star Trek first aired, it featured Kirk when he first commanded the starship Enterprise. The implication with the first season of Star Trek was that the first season took place during the beginning of the ship’s five-year mission. On the other hand, there are signs that there was a time gap during the very first episodes and the later episodes. “Where No Man Has Gone Before” and “The Corbomite Maneuver” had the crew wearing slightly different uniforms than what was shown soon after. In fact, Doctor McCoy was not even around in the pilot episode “Where No Man Has Gone Before”. More importantly, there are implications in the early episodes that the crew of the Enterprise had been on their mission for some time. So, this leaves room for a Star Trek: Year One.

Kirk v Gorn in Arena

There is a headache that the writers of the proposed TV show would have to deal with and that is with continuity. This has plague all the Star Trek TV shows and films as they had to make sure the continuity established in the original Star Trek and later shows and films remained intact. Unfortunately, this did not work out many times and the recent Trek shows received a lot of flack from angry fans, such as with the look of the Klingons, the Gorn and with the early history of Star Trek. For example, Star Trek: Discovery and Star Trek: Strange New Worlds established that there was a Klingon War which was never implicitly mentioned in the original Star Trek, yet it happened close to the era of the original Trek. In the Star Trek episode “Arena” the Gorn looked radically different than the species shown in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, and in the original show, the Enterprise crew acted as if they never heard of the Gorn, who were an ongoing threat in Star Trek: Strange New Worlds. This is an issue that long-running TV shows and films have to grapple with and Star Trek is not unique to this situation. As long as the basic history is adhered to, then fans should be willing to give the writers a pass.

One way out of this would be to do what the 2009 Star Trek film did and establish that the recent Star Trek shows are set in another reality. The trouble is that it has been shown already that the recent Trek shows are set in the so-called Prime Timeline.

The most pressing problem for a so-called Star Trek: Year One has to do with whether or not there is any demand for it. Not everyone is thrilled with Wesley’s performance or the fact that the character has hijacked Star Trek: Strange New Worlds by appearing in practically every other episode. This was supposed to be a show about Christopher Pike not Kirk and we already have an idea of how the early years of Kirk went. Do we need to see it play out? Why not create a new Star Trek adventure with new characters? There are many time periods that have never been covered that are ripe for presenting like the time period between the original Trek and Star Trek: The Next Generation. In fact, a TV show about a young Picard sounds more interesting. Ever since Star Trek: Picard concluded, fans have been begging for a Star Trek: Legacies show featuring the crew of the Enterprise-G with Picard’s son, but it seems like the powers that be are hellbent on ignoring fans and plowing ahead with a young Kirk show. This is a sign that the current showrunners do not truly understand Star Trek. Over the decades, the franchise has proven repeatedly that it was rich enough to provide new characters and situations set in the franchise. It allowed Trek to reinvent itself and not rely on Kirk and his crew to generate interest.

To date it’s not known if Star Trek: Year One will get the green light. A lot depends on studio politics and budgets since modern Trek shows are very expensive. If the show goes through, we’ll have to give it the benefit of the doubt that it will be a worthy addition to the legacy of Star Trek.

Sep 8 2025

Star Trek As It Approaches Its 60th Anniversary

As Star Trek celebrate Star Trek Day and commemorate the 59th anniversary of the famous sci-fi TV show, it is important to reflect on the state of the Star Trek franchise and where it is going as it soon approaches its 60th anniversary.

Star Trek has had its highs and lows throughout the decades in terms of popularity, cultural relevance and quality with its glory years arguably being during the 1990s. After the franchise took a forced hiatus in the mid 2000s, a comeback was attempted with the reboot film Star Trek (2009). The film did well and was popular but a significant number of fans did not appreciate director J.J. Abrams attempt to turn the franchise about space explorers, noted for its thought-provoking plots, into a more simplistic shoot-em-up space adventure that emphasized action and explosions over nifty plots and character developments.

The reboot film franchise came to an end nine years ago with Star Trek Beyond, which did not perform well in theaters, though its tone was more of a throwback to the original TV shows and films. Since then, there have been many failed attempts to produce a fourth film featuring the cast of the reboot films, but none have succeeded and that franchise is now essentially dead. Or is it?

Meanwhile, Star Trek returned to its TV roots in 2017 with the debut of Star Trek: Discovery, a prequel series to the original show that streamed on the app CBS All Access (later renamed Paramount+). Now, while the TV show ran a respectable five seasons and spawned another prequel spinoff, Star Trek: Strange New Worlds, as well as additional Star Trek TV shows, Star Trek: Discovery wound up being divisive among fans. Many complained about the storylines and the characters, with more conservative fans being outright hostile to the show’s featuring of non-heterosexual characters. It did not matter. In this day and age of toxic fandom where cynical content creators are more interested in clicks and views, any iteration of Star Trek would have received scorn.

Right now, Star Trek is at a bit of a crossroads. Its parent company, Paramount Pictures, is undergoing a merger and the fate of the franchise is unknown with many rumors flying around as to its final fate. But there are many reports that the bigwigs at Paramount are bullish on Star Trek and want to continue with the franchise. The question remains is how will it continue? As of now, the only currently streaming Star Trek TV show (Star Trek: Strange New Worlds) will come to a conclusion after its fifth season (the fourth season is currently filming while the third season will complete streaming new episodes this week). After that, a new TV show Star Trek: Starfleet Academy will stream in early 2026, while a sitcom set in the world of Star Trek is in development. Who knows if that comedy will ever see the light of day or even generate any laughs if it comes to fruition.

There are other pitches for Star Trek TV shows, including a prequel series based on a young James T. Kirk, which will be a sequel to Star Trek: Strange New Worlds and would star Paul Wesley reprising the role of Kirk. The show has been tentatively titled Star Trek: Year One and would be about Kirk’s early days as the starship Enterprise captain. Meanwhile, Scott Bakula, the star of Star Trek: Enterprise is involved in a pitch for a show that would take place years after Bakula’s show and feature his character as the president of the United Federation of Planets. Unlike other Star Trek shows, this one would not be a show about exploring worlds but have a political slant more akin to Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. Then there is the fan-favorite idea of Star Trek: Legacy, which would be a sequel to Star Trek: Picard, specifically its popular third season and be about the adventures of the crew of the Enterprise-G. It has been pitched in the past, but so far, Paramount has not shown interest in pursuing Star Trek: Legacy.

Regarding films, there are still plans to produce a fourth film set in the Abrams reboot universe with directors and writers coming and leaving the project. Then Paramount recently announced another film will be produced that will feature all-new characters and situations. That actually sounds interesting but as of now, we have no definite information.

Given all that, there are not any concrete plans for Star Trek TV shows or films aside from the Academy show, which is a bit concerning given that the 60th anniversary is under a year away. You would think Paramount would have something concrete in production. Some of the ideas noted above are interesting and even if they don’t end up as TV shows they can at least become limited series or TV films, just better executed than the hot garbage Star Trek: Section 31. One thing to consider is that 2026 will be a celebration of the original Star Trek, not its sequels and films, and there are three remaining cast members from the original show. Aside from a standard documentary/retrospective, maybe Paramount can find some way to involve William Shatner, George Takei and Walter Koenig in some kind of new Star Trek production. The only limits are time, money and more importantly, imagination. Here’s to boldy going 59 years strong.

Aug 17 2025

Phase Five Of The MCU Ranked

Now that Ironheart has been released on streaming, Phase Five of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) has concluded, and the films and TV shows of Phase Five can now be ranked. On the whole, this phase suffered for many reasons, some of which were beyond the control of Disney and Marvel Studios, and included entertainment strikes, the conviction of actor Jonathan Majors (who played the would-be MCU big baddie, Kang), and rushed productions without completed scripts. However, there were certainly some projects that are considered as some of the MCU’s best and should be lauded. As we move on to Phase Six, let’s rank all the Phase Five MCU films and TV shows. Just note that X-Men ’97 is not included because officially the animated series is not considered part of the MCU, but if it was it would be placed in sixth place.

15. Secret Invasion

Not only is this limp, would-be spy thriller about alien Skrulls infiltrating our civilization the weakest entry of Phase Five, but it is the worst MCU project ever produced. The goal of the Skrulls was moronic, as was the execution of the pedestrian scripts that failed to live up to the premise of the comic book event this limited series was based on. For a supposed paranoid thriller, Secret Invasion lacked any tension, drama, suspense or sense.

14. I Am Groot (season two)

Eh, the animation was well done, and the stories were cute, but as with the first season, the animated shorts were strictly for the kids. One segment, however, was buoyed by the appearance of the enigmatic Watcher and it was rather humorous.

13. Echo

It is clear that this TV show was a leftover from the Bob Chapek era of Disney were anything and everything was rushed into production whether it deserved to or not. The former gangster Echo was one of the dullest characters from Hawkeye, yet somehow, she was given her own TV show which largely came off as a standard and dull crime drama. The appearance by Daredevil and later Wilson Fisk livened things up, but that was about it.

12. What If…? (seasons two and three)

The animated series that explored the Multiverse was a mixed bag with an average second season and a disappointing third season. There were many great premises that could have been explored in the third season, but sadly that never happened. Instead, we got Howard the Duck and his girlfriend protecting their egg in a painfully unfunny episode. But there were a couple of gems featuring Agatha, Winter Solider and Red Guardian. The second season was definitely the stronger of the two as it further explored the more interesting variant characters from the first season like Captain Carter and Stephen Strange. But overall, the Multiverse animated show did not live up to the promise of the first season or the comic books.  

11. The Marvels

The semi-sequel to Captain Marvel is not bad, but it is not good either. There are some interesting character developments that are only glossed over, like Ms. Marvel’s hero worship of Captain Marvel vs. reality or Photon’s abandonment issues with Captain Marvel. But the villain was completely forgettable, and the film felt very rushed. What did not help were some Godawful moments like the alien cats swallowing people as “Memory” played in the soundtrack, or the planet populated by singing people. The introduction of the X-Men into the Multiverse Saga in the post-credits scene was great and nearly salvaged the film, but it was not enough.

10. Ironheart

Here’s another case of a TV show starring an unpopular MCU character. This time it’s Riri Williams from Black Panther: Wakanda Forever. However, Ironheart does a good job presenting Riri Williams/Ironheart. She is a painfully flawed person trying to do what is best but some of her decisions are questionable, as are her associates. The effects were surprisingly good despite the reputation MCU TV shows gained over the years, and many characters were interesting. Not the greatest MCU TV show ever, but it’s still worth watching.

9. Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania

The third Ant-Man film gets a lot of unwarranted hate from fans who were disappointed by the introduction of Kang, the would-be big baddie of the MCU and the Multiverse Saga. Many fans who expected another caper heist film instead were treated to a loopy sci-fi adventure in another dimension featuring giant ants and weird creatures like the floating head MODOK. It did not help that some of the special effects were sketchy. Still, the film was fun in its own way and had some solid performances and was a decent entry into the Multiverse Saga, although its importance has diminished since Kang has been sidelined.

8. Agatha All Along

This sequel to WandaVision was unexpectedly effective thanks to an inspired performance by Kathryn Hahn as the anti-hero sorceress, Agatha Harkness, as she traverses the mystical Witch’s Road with a ragtag coven of eccentric witches. The character development of Agatha was surprisingly effective and made her more of a sympathetic character with a rather tragic backstory. Agatha All Along is a solid entry into the darker and more mystical part of the MCU and a worthwhile middle part of the Scarlett Witch saga that will be conclued with the upcoming Vision Quest.

7. Captain America: Brave New World

In this mishmash of a film there are elements that could have made it a truly great political thriller. But constant reshoots and rewrites of the script noticeably impaired it, although the fourth Captain America film tries very hard and has many memorable elements. For instance, it has great performances by Anthony Mackie and Harrison Ford and many action scenes are well shot and choreographed. A couple of these feature a terrific battle of Captain America fighting the Red Hulk and an intense segment where Captain America and his partner take to the skies to prevent a major war over the ocean. What ultimately harmed the film were the clumsy exposition dumps and haphazard editing that could not quite salvage the film.

6. Your Friendly Neighborhood Spider-Man

This animated series was one of the best surprises in Phase Five of the MCU. At the same time, this exploration of the high school years of Peter Parker/Spider-Man was quite refreshing with its poignant coming-of-age storyline and genuine. The highlight of the series was not the fight scenes or appearances of superheroes like Doctor Strange or Daredevil but the exploration of Peter’s angst and his complicated relationships, especially with Norman Osborn. We know Osborn will become his greatest foe, but in the show, he serves as his hardened mentor who teaches him lessons about having “great power”.

5. Daredevil: Born Again

Charlie Cox and Vincent D’Onofrio make their triumphant returns as Matt Murdock/Daredevil and Wilson Fisk in this sequel to the original Netflix series. As a loose adaptation of the storyline in the comics where the criminal Fisk becomes mayor of New York City, the series was quite engrossing, especially the early and final episodes. It soon became clear that the middle episodes were produced by a different team when it came to their quality. These middle episodes were fine but were wildly outclassed by the early and final episodes, which were nearly perfect works of television art that thankfully we will see more of in the second season.

4. Deadpool & Wolverine

Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman return to their iconic superhero/mercenary roles that were the highlights of the Fox-era X-Men films. Teaming up for the first time, the two have a wild multidimensional romp as they encounter classic and forgotten characters from the pre-MCU Marvel films ranging from the X-Men to Blade. Some may criticize the film for just being a collection of callbacks to previous films and the script did quite have the wit and energy of the first two Deadpool films. Still, Deadpool & Wolverine was a hysterical, gross and action-packed tribute to the pre-MCU era of Marvel films.

3. Loki (season two)

The second and final season of Loki was a time-traveling and mystical marvel (pardon the pun) that was highlighted by the title character’s transformation. The episodes were witty and inventive as Loki worked with his allies to keep time from unraveling. Loki also featured wonderful acting, not just from Tom Hiddleston as Loki, but from Ke Huy Quan, Jonathan Majors and Owen Wilson. The best part of the show, however, was seeing Loki’s emotional journey as he grew into someone much more noble and magnificent as he made the ultimate sacrifice to save the Multiverse and achieve his “Glorious Purpose.”

2. Thunderbolts*

Or The New Avengers as marketing both in the film and IRL would rather you call this misfit team of mercenaries. The film was unexpectedly engaging and full of emotion as it focused on the characters’ inner turmoil. Even though we’ve seen this before: a bunch of losers form a dysfunctional team and actually become heroes, it was done splendidly. After a few misfires during Phase Five, Thunderbolts* signaled that Marvel Studios finally got its act together and went out of its way to present a winning MCU film. While it’s regrettable that the film had disappointing box office returns, this almost does not matter because of the film’s quality. Here’s hoping that the film resonates later on with home viewings.

1. Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 3

James Gunn sends of the beloved Guardians of the Galaxy with a masterful finale that hit all the right emotional spots. Focusing on the team’s soul, Rocket (later Rocket Raccoon), Gunn gave us a painful and traumatizing origin story that doubles as an animal rights tale that deserves to be told. Everyone involved was on point and beyond with Guardians of the Galaxy, Vol. 3, as it was the last hurrah for our favorite cosmic superhero team of misfits. This was classic Guardians at its best with goofy moments, perfect needle drops, wild visuals, a terrifying villain and exciting fight scenes. Gunn’s final film for the MCU is to be cherished because now that he has moved on to Warner Bros. to lead their superhero films, he is already sorely missed by MCU fans.

José Soto

Aug 11 2025

We Are The Winners Of The Summer 2025 Superhero Film War

It sounds like a cliche by now to make a statement that we fans are the true winners of summer 2025’s superhero film wars between Marvel and DC, but it’s true. It does not matter which of the two films, Superman and The Fantastic Four: First Steps, is better, although fans have made arguments that Superman was better than The Fantastic Four: First Steps and vice versa. It’s all subjective and open to interpretation. What matters is that we finally got a summer where the two superhero-based film studios, Marvel Studios and DC Studios, went head to head with top-tier film releases that were well made and successful (more on that soon).

The result was that we were treated to two great superhero films in a relatively short amount of time. It would have been better if they performed better at the box office but they are not flops. Who knows what would have happened if both films pulled in a billion dollars? Would this have triggered some kind of race between the two studios to outdo each other at every turn? This would not be realistic or viable and probably lead to a huge crash after some of their films failed. Perhaps the films would have made a lot more money if their releases were not so close to each other since the films came out in a two-week period. Both studios should adjust their release schedules to consider this.

One thing to dispel is that there isn’t superhero fatigue. That is something that trolls and others want to create a narrative in order to drive clicks and views. Sure, we are past the heyday of the superhero craze and the new normal is that they are not guaranteed box office gold. But that is because too many inferior films came out which turned off many to superhero films. The two studios should share some blame for that but other studios, especially Sony Pictures, dumped out garbage like Madame Web and Morbius, which diluted the Marvel name and superhero films in general. It does not matter that the Sony Spider-Man-less films were not part of the Marvel Studios films; the average moviegoer does not know or pay attention to such subtleties. Even though Sony announced they won’t produce any more of these films, the damage has been done.

Right now both Marvel Studios and DC Studios are in a rebuilding phase. Both of this summer’s superhero films launched new phases for their shared cinematic universes and past history has shown that the early films of the studios started off relatively small but they built interest for the characters who later on headlined blockbuster films. For example, Man of Steel earned $670 million dollars, while that is great for most films, Warner Bros., the parent company of DC Studios, would have preferred it earned more. The following film after Man of Steel, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice was more successful in part because it featured Superman. The problem for Warner Bros. is that they got greedy and impatient and jumped into the big tentpole epics like Justice League, which did not allow for the characters and events to grow naturally. In the end, these films failed to make the money Warner Bros. wanted and eventually the first DC shared universe collapsed.

James Gunn took over the DC films and is now carefully launching a new cinematic universe. For the most part, he is keeping things close as to what direction the films will take. As far as we know the only followup film in the new DC universe that is coming out will be Supergirl, while on TV Lanterns and Peacemaker will be streaming soon. Gunn has made it clear, that future films will only go into production once a complete script satisfies everyone, which is how it should be. Right now, Superman will have earned $600 very soon and maybe will finish out its run earning a bit more, which means it is profitable. This is a promising start for the new DC films but it’s important that Superman appear soon in future films in order to keep the character fresh with audiences.

Meanwhile, the early Marvel Studios films did not even come close to making a billion dollars until The Avengers. The Marvel films released this year were not outright flops nor were they were humongous successes, although the final numbers for The Fantastic Four: First Steps is not known at this time. The films earned from as low as $382 million (for Thunderbolts*) to $434 million and counting for The Fantastic Four: First Steps. In the end, the latter film will probably finish its run with over $500 million, which is respectable.

Marvel Studios tried to repeat this pattern with Phase Four of their films after the Infinity Saga ended. But circumstances prevented followups to the Phase Four films TV shows and characters. Sure, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings was a hit back in 2021 and all, but where is the sequel? Where is Shang-Chi for that matter? Yes, he will appear in Avengers: Doomsday but that will be a time gap of five years between appearances, which is too long. This lack of followup was a huge error on Marvel’s part. They had to keep to momentum going with Shang-Chi, especially since he was an unknown character. In the past, after minor and unknown characters made their debuts, Marvel Studios quickly featured them in other films to keep up interest. Examples of this include the Guardians of the Galaxy and Doctor Strange, who rocketed in popularity after they made appearances in Avengers films and their future films earned much more than their debut films. This even happened with the Marvel Studios version of Spider-Man. His debut film, Spider-Man: Homecoming, did not make a billion dollars but his second and third films did so, easily. This formula will work with the Fantastic Four and other new characters. Thankfully, Marvel Studios will repeat this formula in the upcoming Avengers: Doomsday as that film will feature the Fantastic Four, the Sam Wilson Captain America, and the Thunderbolts.

Both film studios are focusing on quality and long-term strategies, which is great because this will help word of mouth for these superhero films. Marvel Studios now has genuine competition when it comes to producing quality superhero films. Again this is great for us fans. Even the head of Marvel Studios, Kevin Feige, has said in the past that he wanted DC films to succeed because the competition would be good for Marvel Studios. Competition generates innovation and creativity and encourages competitors to do their best work. In fact, the lack of competition from DC could be seen as one of the reasons why Marvel Studios floundered for a few years.

It is great that there is genuine competition between the two superhero film studios. Whether or not Superman or The Fantastic Four: First Steps is more successful is irrelevant at this point, although Superman is the clear winner when it comes to box office result. Both films can be enjoyed by fans for what they bring to the table. What matters is that two great superhero films came out in one summer, which is something we have not had in a while. This is why we are the winners in this competition.

Jul 27 2025

Fourth Time’s The Charm With The Fantastic Four: First Steps

Finally! It took a few missteps (looking at you, Fant4stic!) but with the latest Marvel Studios film, The Fantastic Four: First Steps, we now have the definitive live-action version of Marvel Comics’ First Family, the Fantastic Four.

Unlike most films set in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), The Fantastic Four: First Steps does not take place in the MCU’s 616 universe but in an alternate world designated 828, in honor of Fantastic Four co-creator Jack Kirby. And what a fantastic (couldn’t help it) world this is!

The Fantastic Four: First Steps takes place in a alternate 1960s-era world that has a colorful retro-futuristic vibe with flying cars, clean energy, clunky robots and a New York cityscape that looks like something that Stanley Kubrick, Walt Disney, and architects Eero Saarinen and Oscar Niemeyer would have conceived and executed.

This optimistic world celebrates the superhero team, the Fantastic Four, who were four astronauts that gained superpowers after a mission in space went wrong. The team is made up of its leader, Reed Richards (Pedro Pascal) aka Mr. Fantastic, his wife Susan Storm (Vanessa Kirby) aka the Invisible Woman, her younger brother Johnny Storm (Joseph Quinn) aka the Human Torch, and Reed’s best friend, the pilot Ben Grimm (Ebon Moss-Bachrach) aka the Thing.  

For anyone who is unaware of the team, Reed is an Einstein-level genius who can stretch his body like rubber, Susan is the grounded foundation of the team and can project invisible force fields, Johnny is an impetuous hot-head who can burst into flames and shoot fire, while Ben is trapped in an orange rock body but has super strength. These heroes (and the other characters) were splendidly cast, and the actors perfectly emulate the essence of the Fantastic Four, while capturing the family chemistry that is essential to this superhero team. It was important for Marvel Studios to pull this off since the Fantastic Four are famous for being a family first and a superhero team second. Thankfully, Marvel Studios was able to accomplish this with a casting miracle.  

Unlike the previous Fantastic Four films, this one relegates the team’s origin story to archival footage in the film’s inventive and colorful opening montage. After the montage, the film jumps right into the story. As the Fantastic Four go about living their somewhat normal lives and prepare for the birth of Reed and Susan’s child, an alien being called the Silver Surfer (Julia Garner) appears over Times Square in New York City and announces that the world is slated to be consumed by her master, Galactus (Ralph Ineson). As the last and only hope for the Earth, the Fantastic Four set off in their spaceship to confront Galactus, who is on his way to Earth. What follows after meeting the cosmic colossus pushes the team to their emotional limits as they and the world prepare for the coming of Galactus.

Continue reading →